Literature DB >> 9386870

Followup after 11 years--update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial.

J Frisell1, E Lidbrink, L Hellström, L E Rutqvist.   

Abstract

Results from several randomised mammography screening trials have shown that it is possible to reduce mortality in breast cancer by mammographic screening at least for women above 50 years of age. The purpose of this article is to present data on mortality in breast cancer in study and control groups of the Stockholm trial after 11 years of followup, to analyse which age group benefits most from screening. In March 1981, 40,318 women in Stockholm, aged 40 through 64 years, entered a randomized trial of breast cancer screening by single view mammography alone, versus no intervention in a control group of 20,000 women. Two screening rounds were performed and the attendance rate was over 80% in the two rounds. During 1986 the control group was invited once to screening. Totally 428 and 217 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the study and control groups respectively. After a mean follow-up of 11.4 years a nonsignificant mortality reduction of 26% was observed for the whole study group, with a relative risk (RR) of death in breast cancer of 0.74 (CI(confidence interval) = 0.5-1.1). For women aged 50-64 years a significant 38% mortality reduction was observed with a RR of 0.62 (CI = 0.38-1.0). For women aged 40-49 years no effect on mortality was found, with a RR of death in breast cancer of 1.08 (CI = 0.54-2.17). The breakpoint for benefit in this study seemed to be at 50 years of age when 5-year age groups were analysed, but this tendency is uncertain because of the low statistical power in the analysis of the younger age groups. Long screening intervals, the use of single-view mammography, and the fact that more than 50% of the women in age group 40-49 years were still below 50 years of age when the study was closed, were all facts that could have influenced the results in age group 40-49 years. Larger studies are needed to answer the question whether mammographic screening can be successful in younger age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9386870     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005872617944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  35 in total

1.  Risk of breast cancer in women who attend the NHS breast screening programme: cohort study.

Authors:  A G Threlfall; C B Woodman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

2.  [Bavarian mammography screening program].

Authors:  F Willgeroth; M Baumann; D Blaser; A Crispin; S Froschauer; J de Waal; S Heywang-Köbrunner; D Hölzel; V Kääb; R Rothe; V Stich; S Thomaschewski; D Walter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  [Are chest radiographs justified in pre-employment examinations? Presentation of legal position and medical evidence based on 1760 cases].

Authors:  S C Ladd; U Krause; M E Ladd
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Clinical research methodology I: introduction to randomized trials.

Authors:  Lillian S Kao; Jon E Tyson; Martin L Blakely; Kevin P Lally
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Michel Smans; Richard Sullivan; Peter Boyle
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott Klarenbach; Nicki Sims-Jones; Gabriela Lewin; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Marcello Tonelli; Marion Doull; Susan Courage; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Will screening mammography in the East do more harm than good?

Authors:  Gabriel M Leung; Tai-Hing Lam; Thuan Q Thach; Anthony J Hedley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Svante Bergdahl; Ali Khatami; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Erik Holmberg; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-01-01

10.  Impact of tumour size on axillary involvement and distant dissemination in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Koscielny; R Arriagada; J Adolfsson; T Fornander; J Bergh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.