Literature DB >> 9386066

Five-year outcome after coronary angioplasty versus bypass surgery in multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the French Monocentric Study.

D Carrié1, M Elbaz, J Puel, J Fourcade, E Karouny, G Fournial, M Galinier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) as compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been established. To determine the outcomes of these treatments in patients referred for the first time for coronary revascularization, we conducted a 5-year prospective trial comparing the two procedures.
METHODS: From June 1989 to June 1993, a total of 1939 patients with multivessel coronary disease were screened at a single clinical site, and 152 patients (29%) were randomly assigned to undergo CABG (76 patients) or PTCA (76 patients). Enrollment required that complete revascularization of at least two major vessels supplying different myocardial regions be deemed clinically necessary and technically feasible.
RESULTS: After PTCA or CABG, the clinical success rates were, respectively, 82.9 and 84.2%, whereas in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (1.3% in each group). At 5 years, the proportions of patients in the CABG group who required repeated bypass surgery (0%) or angioplasty (9%) were significantly lower than the proportions in the PTCA group (14.5 and 14.5%, P<.01). Event-free survival was higher in the surgery group (82.9%) than in the PTCA group (68.4%) (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In a carefully selected population of patients with multivessel CAD, angioplasty may offer an effective alternative to bypass surgery. However, to achieve similar clinical outcomes, the patients treated with PTCA are more likely to require further interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9386066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

Review 1.  Revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  K J Beatt; K P Morgan; A Kapur
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Appropriateness of referral of coronary angiography patients in Sweden. SECOR/SBU Project Group.

Authors:  S J Bernstein; B Brorsson; T Aberg; H Emanuelsson; R H Brook; L Werkö
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Comparative effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary disease in a community-based population with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Tara I Chang; Thomas K Leong; Dhruv S Kazi; Hon S Lee; Mark A Hlatky; Alan S Go
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Coronary artery bypass surgery versus coronary stenting: risk-adjusted survival rates in 5,619 patients.

Authors:  Rollo P Villareal; Vei-Vei Lee; MacArthur A Elayda; James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2002

5.  Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Jocelyn M Weiss; Sean M O'Brien; Eric D Peterson; Paul Kolm; Zugui Zhang; Lloyd W Klein; Richard E Shaw; Charles McKay; Laura L Ritzenthaler; Jeffrey J Popma; John C Messenger; David M Shahian; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Cynthia M Shewan; Kirk N Garratt; Issam D Moussa; George D Dangas; Fred H Edwards
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery: socioeconomic inequalities in access and in 30 day mortality. A population-based study in Rome, Italy.

Authors:  C Ancona; N Agabiti; F Forastiere; M Arcà; D Fusco; S Ferro; C A Perucci
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Percutaneous versus surgical interventions for coronary artery disease in those with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ozlem Soran
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for diabetics with multivessel coronary artery disease: the Korean Multicenter Revascularization Registry (KORR).

Authors:  Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Seung Hee Choi; Byung-Il William Choi; Seung Yun Cho; Young Moo Ro; Won Ro Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Adam J Buntaine; Binita Shah; Jeffrey D Lorin; Steven P Sedlis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Reduced risk of myocardial infarct and revascularization following coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  David M Charytan; Manisha Desai; Maya Mathur; Noam M Stern; Maria M Brooks; Lukasz J Krzych; Gerhard C Schuler; Jan Kaehler; Alfredo M Rodriguez-Granillo; Whady Hueb; Barnaby C Reeves; Holger Thiele; Alfredo E Rodriguez; Piotr P Buszman; Paweł E Buszman; Rie Maurer; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 10.612

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.