| Literature DB >> 27339854 |
Adam J Buntaine1, Binita Shah2, Jeffrey D Lorin1, Steven P Sedlis1.
Abstract
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have more severe CAD and higher mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than patients without DM. The optimal mode of revascularization-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-remains controversial in this setting. For patients with DM and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, prompt revascularization of the culprit artery via PCI is generally preferable. In non-ST-elevation ACS, the decision on mode of revascularization is more challenging. Trials comparing CABG with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, bare metal stents, and first-generation drug-eluting stents in DM patients with multivessel have demonstrated decreased mortality in those receiving CABG. On the other hand, trials and retrospective analyses comparing CABG to PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents have not shown a statistically significant mortality benefit favoring CABG. This potentially narrowed that gap between CABG and PCI requires further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Diabetes mellitus; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27339854 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-016-0756-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep ISSN: 1523-3782 Impact factor: 2.931