Literature DB >> 9386028

Satisfaction and the three C's: continuity, choice and control. Women's views from a randomised controlled trial of midwife-led care.

V A Hundley1, J M Milne, C M Glazener, J Mollison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 1. To explore whether there are differences in women's satisfaction with care in a midwife-managed delivery unit compared with that in a consultant-led labour ward. 2. To compare factors relating to continuity, choice and control between the two randomised groups.
DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Grampian. SAMPLE: 2844 women, identified at booking as low risk, were randomised in a 2:1 ratio between the midwives' unit and the labour ward. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction, continuity of carer, choice, and control.
RESULTS: Satisfaction with the overall experience did not differ between the groups. Satisfaction with how labour and delivery was managed by staff was slightly higher in the midwives' unit group, but this did not reach the 0.1% level of significance. Women allocated to the midwives' unit group saw significantly fewer medical staff and were less likely to report numerous individuals entering the room. They were more likely to report having had a choice regarding mobility and alternative positions for delivery and were significantly more likely to have made their own decisions regarding pain relief.
CONCLUSIONS: The issues surrounding the measurement of satisfaction with childbirth need further investigation. Until this area is clarified it would be unwise to use an overall measure of satisfaction as an indicator of the quality of maternity service provision. In particular, the current measures are not sensitive enough to examine the specific factors which affect women's satisfaction. Further research is required to assess which factors are important to women if they are to have a positive experience of childbirth and how these priorities change over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9386028     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10974.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  10 in total

Review 1.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Gp Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Midwifery care: reflections of midwifery clients.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Doherty
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.

Authors:  Ellen D Hodnett; Soo Downe; Denis Walsh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 4.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-16

5.  Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Wendy Christiaens; Mieke Verhaeghe; Piet Bracke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women.

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Anna Margrethe Møller; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Lisbeth B Knudsen; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Births in two different delivery units in the same clinic--a prospective study of healthy primiparous women.

Authors:  Britt Ingeborg Eide; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challenges.

Authors:  Mark S Corbett; Judith Watson; Alison Eastwood
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Creating a positive perception of childbirth experience: systematic review and meta-analysis of prenatal and intrapartum interventions.

Authors:  Mahshid Taheri; Amirhossien Takian; Ziba Taghizadeh; Nahid Jafari; Nasrin Sarafraz
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Effects of the birthing room environment on vaginal births and client-centred outcomes for women at term planning a vaginal birth: BE-UP, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gertrud M Ayerle; Rainhild Schäfers; Elke Mattern; Sabine Striebich; Burkhard Haastert; Markus Vomhof; Andrea Icks; Yvonne Ronniger; Gregor Seliger
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.