Literature DB >> 9385475

Valsartan: long-term efficacy and tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension.

A D Bremner1, M Baur, P Oddou-Stock, F Bodin.   

Abstract

A total of 501 elderly patients with essential hypertension were randomized to receive valsartan or lisinopril in this one year multi-center, double-blind, parallel group trial. Patients received valsartan 40 mg (n = 334) or lisinopril 2.5 mg (n = 167) daily for 2 weeks with subsequent titration (alone or in combination with hydroclorothiazide), depending on response to treatment. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients with a response, defined as sitting diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or drop of > or = 10 mmHg from baseline. A high percentage of patients responded to treatment in both valsartan and lisinopril groups: 80% for both groups at 12 weeks and 81% and 87%, respectively, at 52 weeks with no statistically significant difference between treatments (12 weeks, p = 0.925; 52 weeks, p = 0.148). More patients on lisinopril experienced drug-related cough (7.5% on valsartan, 17.4% on lisinopril). In 5.4% of lisinopril treated patients, cough led to discontinuation of therapy compared to 0.6% on valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg daily provides comparable short and long-term antihypertensive efficacy to lisinopril in elderly patients with a lower incidence of drug-related cough.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9385475     DOI: 10.3109/10641969709083217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens        ISSN: 1064-1963            Impact factor:   1.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  Valsartan. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  A Markham; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Valsartan. Just a second-line antihypertensive drug.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Therapeutic trials comparing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Authors:  W J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Olmesartan medoxomil in elderly patients with essential or isolated systolic hypertension : efficacy and safety data from clinical trials.

Authors:  Anthony M Heagerty; Jean-Michel Mallion
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Evaluation of the dose response with valsartan and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Nora Crikelair; Drew Levy; Ricardo Rocha; Venkatram Kuturu; Robert Glazer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Evaluation of dosing time-related anti-hypertensive efficacy of valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Katsunori Suzuki; Yoshifusa Aizawa
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 1.749

7.  Effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on total and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in primary prevention: A nationwide study based on French Health Insurance Data (SNDS).

Authors:  Emmanuel Oger; Sandrine Kerbrat; Emmanuel Nowak; François Paillard; Pierre-Yves Scarabin; André Happe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Comparative First-Line Effectiveness and Safety of ACE (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: A Multinational Cohort Study.

Authors:  RuiJun Chen; Marc A Suchard; Harlan M Krumholz; Martijn J Schuemie; Steven Shea; Jon Duke; Nicole Pratt; Christian G Reich; David Madigan; Seng Chan You; Patrick B Ryan; George Hripcsak
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 9.897

9.  Azilsartan compared to ACE inhibitors in anti-hypertensive therapy: one-year outcomes of the observational EARLY registry.

Authors:  Anselm K Gitt; Peter Bramlage; Sebastian A Potthoff; Peter Baumgart; Felix Mahfoud; Hartmut Buhck; Martina Ehmen; Taoufik Ouarrak; Jochen Senges; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.