Literature DB >> 9382846

Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells.

W F Marshall1, A Straight, J F Marko, J Swedlow, A Dernburg, A Belmont, A W Murray, D A Agard, J W Sedat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structural studies of fixed cells have revealed that interphase chromosomes are highly organized into specific arrangements in the nucleus, and have led to a picture of the nucleus as a static structure with immobile chromosomes held in fixed positions, an impression apparently confirmed by recent photobleaching studies. Functional studies of chromosome behavior, however, suggest that many essential processes, such as recombination, require interphase chromosomes to move around within the nucleus.
RESULTS: To reconcile these contradictory views, we exploited methods for tagging specific chromosome sites in living cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with green fluorescent protein and in Drosophila melanogaster with fluorescently labeled topoisomerase ll. Combining these techniques with submicrometer single-particle tracking, we directly measured the motion of interphase chromatin, at high resolution and in three dimensions. We found that chromatin does indeed undergo significant diffusive motion within the nucleus, but this motion is constrained such that a given chromatin segment is free to move within only a limited subregion of the nucleus. Chromatin diffusion was found to be insensitive to metabolic inhibitors, suggesting that it results from classical Brownian motion rather than from active motility. Nocodazole greatly reduced chromatin confinement, suggesting a role for the cytoskeleton in the maintenance of nuclear architecture.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that chromatin is free to undergo substantial Brownian motion, but that a given chromatin segment is confined to a subregion of the nucleus. This constrained diffusion is consistent with a highly defined nuclear architecture, but also allows enough motion for processes requiring chromosome motility to take place. These results lead to a model for the regulation of chromosome interactions by nuclear architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9382846     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00412-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  244 in total

1.  Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation.

Authors:  S M Burgess; N Kleckner; B M Weiner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Nuclear position leaves its mark on replication timing.

Authors:  D M Gilbert
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 10.539

3.  Time-resolved analysis and visualization of dynamic processes in living cells.

Authors:  W Tvaruskó; M Bentele; T Misteli; R Rudolf; C Kaether; D L Spector; H H Gerdes; R Eils
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei.

Authors:  H B Sun; J Shen; H Yokota
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Quantitative imaging of pre-mRNA splicing factors in living cells.

Authors:  R Eils; D Gerlich; W Tvaruskó; D L Spector; T Misteli
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Quantitative motion analysis of subchromosomal foci in living cells using four-dimensional microscopy.

Authors:  H Bornfleth; P Edelmann; D Zink; T Cremer; C Cremer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Correlated positioning of homologous chromosomes in daughter fibroblast cells.

Authors:  H B Sun; H Yokota
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Plant nuclei can contain extensive grooves and invaginations.

Authors:  D A Collings; C N Carter; J C Rink; A C Scott; S E Wyatt; N S Allen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Directional bias during mating type switching in Saccharomyces is independent of chromosomal architecture.

Authors:  Peter Simon; Peter Houston; James Broach
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Chromosomal G-dark bands determine the spatial organization of centromeric heterochromatin in the nucleus.

Authors:  C Carvalho; H M Pereira; J Ferreira; C Pina; D Mendonça; A C Rosa; M Carmo-Fonseca
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.