Literature DB >> 9382384

The Stroke Prevention Policy Model: linking evidence and clinical decisions.

D B Matchar1, G P Samsa, J R Matthews, M Ancukiewicz, G Parmigiani, V Hasselblad, P A Wolf, R B D'Agostino, J Lipscomb.   

Abstract

Simulation models that support decision and cost-effectiveness analysis can further the goals of evidence-based medicine by facilitating the synthesis of information from several sources into a single comprehensive structure. The Stroke Prevention Policy Model (SPPM) performs this function for the clinical and policy questions that surround stroke prevention. This paper first describes the basic structure and functions of the SPPM, concentrating on the role of large databases (broadly defined as any database that contains many patients, regardless of study design) in providing the SPPM inputs. Next, recognizing that the use of modeling continues to be a source of some controversy in the medical community, it discusses the philosophical underpinnings of the SPPM. Finally, it discusses conclusions in the context of both stroke prevention and other complex medical decisions. We conclude that despite the difficulties in developing comprehensive models (for example, the length and complexity of model development and validation processes, the proprietary nature of data sources, and the necessity for developing new software), the benefits of such models exceed the costs of continuing to rely on more conventional methods. Although they should not replace the clinician in decision making, comprehensive models based on the best available evidence from large databases can support decision making in medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9382384     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  10 in total

Review 1.  The contrast and convergence of Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches in pharmacoeconomic analysis.

Authors:  Grant H Skrepnek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The future of scientific medicine.

Authors:  F Davidoff
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-08-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Dynamic microsimulation models for health outcomes: a review.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Alan M Zaslavsky; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  The impact of patient self-testing of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: rationale and design of VA Cooperative Study #481--the Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  David B Matchar; Alan K Jacobson; Robert G Edson; Philip W Lavori; Jack E Ansell; Michael D Ezekowitz; Frederick Rickles; Lou Fiore; Kathy Boardman; Ciaran Phibbs; Stephan D Fihn; Julia E Vertrees; Rowena Dolor
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Direct costs of glaucoma and severity of the disease: a multinational long term study of resource utilisation in Europe.

Authors:  C E Traverso; J G Walt; S P Kelly; A H Hommer; A M Bron; P Denis; J-P Nordmann; J-P Renard; A Bayer; F Grehn; N Pfeiffer; C Cedrone; S Gandolfi; N Orzalesi; C Nucci; L Rossetti; A Azuara-Blanco; A Bagnis; R Hitchings; J F Salmon; G Bricola; P M Buchholz; S V Kotak; L M Katz; L R Siegartel; J J Doyle
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--2.

Authors:  Mark Roberts; Louise B Russell; A David Paltiel; Michael Chambers; Phil McEwan; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 7.  Comparative effectiveness and implementation research: directions for neurology.

Authors:  Barbara G Vickrey; Deborah Hirtz; Salina Waddy; Eric M Cheng; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Validation of a decision model for preventive pharmacological strategies in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sylvie Perreault; Carey Levinton; Claudine Laurier; Yola Moride; Louis-Georges Ste-Marie; Ralph Crott
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Combining information from multiple data sources to create multivariable risk models: illustration and preliminary assessment of a new method.

Authors:  Greg Samsa; Guizhou Hu; Martin Root
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2005-06-30

10.  Use of dynamic microsimulation to predict disease progression in patients with pneumonia-related sepsis.

Authors:  Görkem Saka; Jennifer E Kreke; Andrew J Schaefer; Chung-Chou H Chang; Mark S Roberts; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.