Literature DB >> 16082603

The impact of patient self-testing of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: rationale and design of VA Cooperative Study #481--the Home INR Study (THINRS).

David B Matchar1, Alan K Jacobson, Robert G Edson, Philip W Lavori, Jack E Ansell, Michael D Ezekowitz, Frederick Rickles, Lou Fiore, Kathy Boardman, Ciaran Phibbs, Stephan D Fihn, Julia E Vertrees, Rowena Dolor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation (AC) with warfarin reduces the risk of thromboembolism (TE) in a variety of applications, yet despite compelling evidence of the value and importance of high quality AC, warfarin remains underused, and dosing is often suboptimal. Approaches to improve AC quality include (1) an AC service (ACS), which allows the physician to delegate day-to-day details of AC management to another provider dedicated to AC care, and (2) incorporating into the treatment plan patient self-testing (PST) under which, after completing a training program, patients perform their own blood testing (typically, using a finger-stick blood analyzer), have dosage adjustments guided by a standard protocol, and forward test results, dosing and other information to the provider. Studies have suggested that PST can improve the quality of AC and perhaps lower TE and bleed rates. The purpose of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) #481, "The Home INR Study" (THINRS) is to compare AC management with frequent PST using a home monitoring device to high quality AC management (HQACM) implemented by an ACS with conventional monitoring of prothrombin time by international normalized ratio (INR) on major health outcomes. PST in THINRS involves use of an INR monitoring device that is FDA approved for home use. STUDY
DESIGN: Sites are VA Medical Centers where the ACS has an active roster of more than 400 patients. THINRS includes patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or mechanical heart valve (MHV) expected to be anticoagulated indefinitely. THINRS has two parts. In Part 1, candidates for PST are evaluated for 2 to 4 weeks for their ability to use home monitoring devices. In Part 2, individuals capable of performing PST are randomized to (1) HQACM with testing every 4 weeks and as indicated for out of range values, medication/clinical changes, or (2) PST with testing every week and as indicated for out of range values, medication/clinical changes. The primary outcome measure is event rates, defined as the percent of patients who have a stroke, major bleed, or die. Secondary outcomes include total time in range (TTR), other events (myocardial infarction (MI), non-stroke TE, minor bleeds), competence and compliance with PST, satisfaction with AC, AC associated quality of life (QOL), and cost-effectiveness. To assess the effect of PST frequency on TTR and other outcomes, at selected sites patients randomized to perform PST are assigned one of three test frequencies (weekly, twice weekly, or once every four weeks).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082603     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-005-1452-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  30 in total

1.  The effect of low-dose warfarin on the risk of stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daniel E Singer; Robert A Hughes; Daryl R Gress; Mary A Sheehan; Lynn B Oertel; Sue Ward Maraventano; Dyan Ryan Blewett; Bernard Rosner; J Philip Kistler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range.

Authors:  J Hirsh; J E Dalen; D R Anderson; L Poller; H Bussey; J Ansell; D Deykin; J T Brandt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Tables of the number of patients required in clinical trials using the logrank test.

Authors:  L S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1982 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Home prothrombin time monitoring after the initiation of warfarin therapy. A randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  R H White; S A McCurdy; H von Marensdorff; D E Woodruff; L Leftgoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Improving the quality of anticoagulation of patients with atrial fibrillation in managed care organizations: results of the managing anticoagulation services trial.

Authors:  David B Matchar; Gregory P Samsa; Stuart J Cohen; Eugene Z Oddone; Annette E Jurgelski
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  F R Rosendaal; S C Cannegieter; F J van der Meer; E Briët
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Evaluation of sample size and power for analyses of survival with allowance for nonuniform patient entry, losses to follow-up, noncompliance, and stratification.

Authors:  J M Lachin; M A Foulkes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation (CAFA) Study.

Authors:  S J Connolly; A Laupacis; M Gent; R S Roberts; J A Cairns; C Joyner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves.

Authors:  S C Cannegieter; F R Rosendaal; A R Wintzen; F J van der Meer; J P Vandenbroucke; E Briët
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A new instrument for measuring anticoagulation-related quality of life: development and preliminary validation.

Authors:  Greg Samsa; David B Matchar; Rowena J Dolor; Ingela Wiklund; Ewa Hedner; Gail Wygant; Ole Hauch; Cheryl Beadle Marple; Roger Edwards
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  6 in total

1.  An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; R Lynne Ruybalid; Lauren Uyeda; Robert G Edson; Ciaran Phibbs; Julia E Vertrees; Mei-Chiung Shih; Alan K Jacobson; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  At-Home Versus In-Clinic INR Monitoring: A Cost-Utility Analysis from The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Ciaran S Phibbs; Sean R Love; Alan K Jacobson; Robert Edson; Pon Su; Lauren Uyeda; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Danielle E Clarkesmith; Helen M Pattison; Phyo H Khaing; Deirdre A Lane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  The impact of frequency of patient self-testing of prothrombin time on time in target range within VA Cooperative Study #481: The Home INR Study (THINRS), a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David B Matchar; Sean R Love; Alan K Jacobson; Robert Edson; Lauren Uyeda; Ciaran S Phibbs; Rowena J Dolor
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Safety and effectiveness of point-of-care monitoring devices in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philip S Wells; Allan Brown; James Jaffey; Lynda McGahan; Man-Chiu Poon; Karen Cimon
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-10-16

6.  Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.