Literature DB >> 938023

Relative inactivation by Staphylococcus aureus of eight cephalosporin antibiotics.

I W Fong, E R Engelking, W M Kirby.   

Abstract

These studies extend the recent observation that cefazolin is inactivated to a greater extent than cephaloridine by some strains of penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus, whereas cephalothin undergoes little if any inactivation. In Mueller-Hinton broth (inoculum, 3 x 10(6)) 100 recently isolated strains had minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) </= 2 mug/ml for cephalothin and cephaloridine, whereas in Trypticase soy broth (TSB) 50% had MICs > 2 mug/ml and 10% (designated "resistant" strains) were >8 mug/ml for cephaloridine but remained </=2 mug/ml for cephalothin. A large inoculum (3 x 10(7)) of strains with high MICs in TSB almost completely inactivated 50 mug of cefazolin per ml in 6 h, with progressively less inactivation, in the following order, of cephaloridine, cephalexin, cephradine, cephapirin, and cefamandole; cefoxitin and cephalothin underwent little if any inactivation. The greater inactivation in TSB than in Mueller-Hinton broth appeared to be due to a greater production of beta-lactamases by each colony-forming unit, since the inoculum size in the two broths was not significantly different. In contrast, "susceptible" strains (MICs </= 2 mug/ml in both broths) inactivated cephaloridine more than cefazolin, and equal amounts of powdered bacterial extracts confirmed the fact that qualitatively different beta-lactamases were produced by the susceptible and resistant strains. Disk diffusion tests were unreliable in separating the two groups of staphylococci. The clinical significance of inactivation by strains with high MICs is not known but, unless susceptibility can be clearly established, cephalothin appears preferable for severe staphylococcal infections, since it undergoes little if any inactivation by any strains of staphylococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 938023      PMCID: PMC429654          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.9.6.939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  6 in total

1.  Effect of inoculum and of beta-lactamase on the anti-staphylococcal activity of thirteen penicillins and cephalosporins.

Authors:  L D Sabath; C Garner; C Wilcox; M Finland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Simplified, accurate method for antibiotic assay of clinical specimens.

Authors:  J V Bennett; J L Brodie; E J Benner; W M Kirby
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966-03

3.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Inactivation of cefazolin, cephaloridine, and cephalothin by methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Regamey; R D Libke; E R Engelking; J T Clarke; M M Kirby
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Failure of cephaloridine in a case of staphylococcal endocarditis.

Authors:  H A Burgess; R J Evans
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1966-11-19

6.  Inactivation of cephalothin and cephaloridine by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  E J Benner; J V Bennett; J L Brodie; W M Kirby
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 3.490

  6 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Reappraisal of the antistaphylococcal activities of first-generation (narrow-spectrum) and second-generation (expanded-spectrum) cephalosporins.

Authors:  L D Sabath
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Characterization of four beta-lactamases produced by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D J Zygmunt; C W Stratton; D S Kernodle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of in vitro activity of cephalexin, cephradine, and cefaclor.

Authors:  N J Bill; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Influence of growth medium on the in vitro activities of second- and third-generation cephalosporins against Streptococcus faecalis.

Authors:  D F Sahm; C N Baker; R N Jones; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Activity of ten cephalosporins on biomass of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  E Yourassowsky; M P Van der Linden; M J Lismont; F Crokaert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Lack of reproducibility of macrodilution MBCs for Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  L L Pelletier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro susceptibilities of four species of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  R J Fass; V L Helsel; J Barnishan; L W Ayers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Use of a heavy inoculum in the in vitro evaluation of the anti-staphylococcal activity of 19 cephalosporins.

Authors:  M Laverdiere; D Welter; L D Sabath
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Efficacy of cefazolin, cefamandole, and gentamicin as prophylactic agents in cardiac surgery. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in 1030 patients.

Authors:  A B Kaiser; M R Petracek; J W Lea; D S Kernodle; A C Roach; W C Alford; G R Burrus; D M Glassford; C S Thomas; W S Stoney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Beta lactamase resistance of newer cephalosporins and antimicrobial effectiveness against gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  W E Farrar; N M O'Dell
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.