Literature DB >> 9379266

Sustained proliferation accompanies distraction osteogenesis in the rat.

J Aronson1, X C Shen, G G Gao, F Miller, T Quattlebaum, R A Skinner, T M Badger, C K Lumpkin.   

Abstract

These studies were conducted to compare the local cellular proliferation patterns in the rat tibia during distraction osteogenesis with those during nondistracted fracture healing. Bone specimens from distraction osteogenesis and nondistracted fracture groups were analyzed 2, 10, and 20 days after surgery. Proliferation was determined by metabolic labeling with [3H]thymidine and by immunocytochemistry with an antibody to proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Videomicroscopy was used to count the cells staining positively within specified regions. The number of cells incorporating [3H]thymidine was positively correlated (r2 = 0.78) with the number of proliferating cell nuclear antigen positive cells on alternating serial slides. At day 2, the latter cells were largely confined to the bone marrow and periosteum in both groups, and the cell numbers per mm2 were also equivalent. At days 10 and 20, the proliferating cell nuclear antigen positive cells predominated in both the proximal and distal primary matrix front zones in the distraction osteogenesis group. In contrast, the proliferating cell nuclear antigen positive cells in the nondistracted fracture group were scattered throughout the healing area. Significantly more of these cells were in the primary matrix front zones than in any location within the nondistracted fracture-healing area. The number of these cells in the bone marrow adjacent to the surgical area declined from day 2 to day 10 in both groups. The results suggest that (a) proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunostaining is a reliable indicator of cycling cells; (b) by day 10, distraction osteogenesis is characterized by a zone-specific pattern of proliferating cells; and (c) distraction osteogenesis prolongs the stimulation of proliferation within the gap after fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9379266     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100150412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  16 in total

1.  Relationships between tissue dilatation and differentiation in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Michael T Longaker; Dennis R Carter
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 2.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 3.  Distraction histogenesis of the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Aydin Gülses; Metin Sencimen; Mustafa Ayna; Matthias Gierloff; Yahya Açil
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-18

4.  Effects of systemic and local administration of recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) on de novo bone formation in an aged mouse model.

Authors:  John L Fowlkes; Kathryn M Thrailkill; Lichu Liu; Elizabeth C Wahl; Robert C Bunn; Gael E Cockrell; Daniel S Perrien; James Aronson; Charles K Lumpkin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Matthew E Lawler; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Distraction osteogenesis in TNF receptor 1 deficient mice is protected from chronic ethanol exposure.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wahl; James Aronson; Lichu Liu; Robert A Skinner; Martin J J Ronis; Charles K Lumpkin
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Direct bone formation during distraction osteogenesis does not require TNFalpha receptors and elevated serum TNFalpha fails to inhibit bone formation in TNFR1 deficient mice.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wahl; James Aronson; Lichu Liu; Robert A Skinner; Mike J Miller; Gael E Cockrell; John L Fowlkes; Kathryn M Thrailkill; Robert C Bunn; Martin J J Ronis; Charles K Lumpkin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Rosiglitazone disrupts endosteal bone formation during distraction osteogenesis by local adipocytic infiltration.

Authors:  Lichu Liu; James Aronson; Beata Lecka-Czernik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and RUNX2-related osteogenic genes are down-regulated throughout osteogenesis in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  John L Fowlkes; R Clay Bunn; Lichu Liu; Elizabeth C Wahl; Hannah N Coleman; Gael E Cockrell; Daniel S Perrien; Charles K Lumpkin; Kathryn M Thrailkill
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 4.736

10.  Chronic ethanol exposure inhibits distraction osteogenesis in a mouse model: role of the TNF signaling axis.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wahl; James Aronson; Lichu Liu; Zhendong Liu; Daniel S Perrien; Robert A Skinner; Thomas M Badger; Martin J J Ronis; Charles K Lumpkin
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.