Literature DB >> 9376261

Photodynamic therapy of early squamous cell carcinoma with tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin: optimal drug-light interval.

S Andrejevic-Blant1, C Hadjur, J P Ballini, G Wagnières, C Fontolliet, H van den Bergh, P Monnier.   

Abstract

The optimal drug-light interval for effective photodynamic therapy (PDT) of early squamous cell carcinomas was evaluated with tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) by means of two complementary modalities: irradiation tests and ex vivo fluorescence microscopy. A Syrian hamster cheek pouch tumour model was used in these experiments. Photodynamic therapy on both tumour-bearing and contralateral healthy cheek pouch mucosae was performed at 650 nm and 514 nm. Light doses of 12 J cm(-2) were delivered at a light dose rate of 150 mW cm(-2) and light doses of 80 J cm(-2) were delivered at a light dose rate of 100 mW cm(-2) respectively, at these two wavelengths, between 6 h and 12 days after the injection of 0.5 mg kg(-1) body weight mTHPC. Two histologically different types of tissue damage were observed: first, a non-selective and non-specific ischaemic vascular necrosis for the cases in which PDT took place during the first 48 h after the injection of the dye and, second, tissue-specific PDT damage, as a coagulation necrosis, when PDT took place more than 72 h after injection of the dye. The time-dependent biodistribution of mTHPC investigated by fluorescence microscopy shows a weak and non-significant difference in relative fluorescence intensities between early SCC and healthy mucosae. Up to 2 days after the injection, the drug is mainly localized in the endothelial cells of the blood vessels. After this period, the dye accumulates in the squamous epithelia with a concentration peaking at 4 days. At all time points, a weak fluorescence intensity is observed in the underlying lamina propria and striated muscle. The information obtained from these studies could well be relevant to clinical trials as it suggests that time delays between 4 and 8 days after i.v. injection should be optimal for PDT of early malignancies in hollow organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9376261      PMCID: PMC2228103          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  21 in total

1.  Experimental carcinogenesis in the cheek pouch of the Syrian hamster.

Authors:  J J SALLEY
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1954-04       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Comparative analysis of mammalian plasma lipoproteins.

Authors:  M J Chapman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 3.  Biodistribution of photosensitizing agents.

Authors:  D Kessel; K Woodburn
Journal:  Int J Biochem       Date:  1993-10

4.  Photodynamic therapy in the management of early superficial squamous cell carcinoma as an alternative to surgical resection.

Authors:  E S Edell; D A Cortese
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Effect of drug-light interval on photodynamic therapy with meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin in malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  H B Ris; H J Altermatt; B Nachbur; J C Stewart; Q Wang; C K Lim; R Bonnett; U Althaus
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-01-02       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  A prospective phase II study on photodynamic therapy with photofrin II for centrally located early-stage lung cancer. The Japan Lung Cancer Photodynamic Therapy Study Group.

Authors:  K Furuse; M Fukuoka; H Kato; T Horai; K Kubota; N Kodama; Y Kusunoki; N Takifuji; T Okunaka; C Konaka
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Photodynamic therapy of malignant and premalignant lesions in patients with 'field cancerization' of the oral cavity.

Authors:  W E Grant; C Hopper; P M Speight; A J Macrobert; S G Bown
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Photodynamic therapy with m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin in vivo: optimization of the therapeutic index.

Authors:  H B Ris; H J Altermatt; C M Stewart; T Schaffner; Q Wang; C K Lim; R Bonnett; U Althaus
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-09-09       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Photodynamic therapy using m-tetra(hydroxyphenyl) chlorin. An animal model.

Authors:  L A Lofgren; A M Ronn; A L Abramson; M J Shikowitz; M Nouri; C J Lee; J Batti; B M Steinberg
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-12

10.  Fluorescence distribution and photodynamic effect of ALA-induced PP IX in the DMH rat colonic tumour model.

Authors:  J Bedwell; A J MacRobert; D Phillips; S G Bown
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization.

Authors:  Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Photodynamic therapy: a review.

Authors:  J S McCaughan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Photodynamic Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bashar J Qumseya; Waseem David; Herbert C Wolfsen
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-01-31

4.  In vivo confocal fluorescence imaging of the intratumor distribution of the photosensitizer mono-L-aspartylchlorin-e6.

Authors:  Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Photodynamic dose does not correlate with long-term tumor response to mTHPC-PDT performed at several drug-light intervals.

Authors:  Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Foscan uptake and tissue distribution in relation to photodynamic efficacy.

Authors:  P Cramers; M Ruevekamp; H Oppelaar; O Dalesio; P Baas; F A Stewart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Enhanced antitumor activity of the photosensitizer meso-Tetra(N-methyl-4-pyridyl) porphine tetra tosylate through encapsulation in antibody-targeted chitosan/alginate nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sharif M Abdelghany; Daniela Schmid; Jill Deacon; Jakub Jaworski; Francois Fay; Kirsty M McLaughlin; Julie A Gormley; James F Burrows; Daniel B Longley; Ryan F Donnelly; Christopher J Scott
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Selectivity of the photosensitiser Tookad for photodynamic therapy evaluated in the Syrian golden hamster cheek pouch tumour model.

Authors:  F Borle; A Radu; C Fontolliet; H van den Bergh; P Monnier; G Wagnières
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Photoimmunotherapy of Ovarian Cancer: A Unique Niche in the Management of Advanced Disease.

Authors:  Shubhankar Nath; Mohammad Ahsan Saad; Michael Pigula; Joseph W R Swain; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.