Literature DB >> 18777912

Photodynamic dose does not correlate with long-term tumor response to mTHPC-PDT performed at several drug-light intervals.

Ken Kang-Hsin Wang1, Soumya Mitra, Thomas H Foster.   

Abstract

Meso-tetra-hydroxyphenyl-chlorin (mTHPC, Foscan), a promising photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT), is approved in Europe for the palliative treatment of head and neck cancer. Based on work in mice that investigated optimal tumor accumulation, clinical protocols with Foscan typically employ an interval of 96 h between systemic sensitizer administration and irradiation. However, recent studies in mouse tumor models have demonstrated significantly improved long-term tumor response when irradiation is performed at shorter drug-light intervals of 3 and 6 h. Using a previously published theoretical model of microscopic PDT dosimetry and informed by experimentally determined photophysical properties and intratumor sensitizer concentrations and distributions, we calculated photodynamic dose depositions following mTHPC-PDT for drug-light intervals of 3, 6, 24, and 96 h. Our results demonstrate that the singlet oxygen dose to the tumor volume does not track even qualitatively with tumor responses for these four drug-light intervals. Further, microscopic analysis of simulated singlet oxygen deposition shows that in no case do any subpopulations of tumor cells receive a threshold dose. Indeed, under the conditions of these simulations more than 90% of the tumor volume receives a dose that is approximately 20-fold lower than the threshold dose for mTHPC. Thus, in this evaluation of mTHPC-PDT at various drug-light intervals, any PDT dose metric that is proportional to singlet oxygen creation and/or deposition would fail to predict the tumor response. In situations like this one, other reporters of biological response to therapy would be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18777912      PMCID: PMC2562246          DOI: 10.1118/1.2952360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  34 in total

1.  Effects of fluence rate on cell survival and photobleaching in meta-tetra-(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin-photosensitized Colo 26 multicell tumor spheroids.

Authors:  S Coutier; S Mitra; L N Bezdetnaya; R M Parache; I Georgakoudi; T H Foster; F Guillemin
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Evaluation of blood oxygen saturation in vivo from diffuse reflectance spectra.

Authors:  A A Stratonnikov; V B Loschenov
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Photophysical parameters, photosensitizer retention and tissue optical properties completely account for the higher photodynamic efficacy of meso-tetra-hydroxyphenyl-chlorin vs Photofrin.

Authors:  Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  A comprehensive mathematical model of microscopic dose deposition in photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Singlet oxygen luminescence dosimetry (SOLD) for photodynamic therapy: current status, challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Mark T Jarvi; Mark J Niedre; Michael S Patterson; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Photodynamic therapy-mediated oxidative stress as a molecular switch for the temporal expression of genes ligated to the human heat shock promoter.

Authors:  M C Luna; A Ferrario; S Wong; A M Fisher; C J Gomer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumor immunity.

Authors:  Sandra O Gollnick; Barbara Owczarczak; Patricia Maier
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Temporally and spatially heterogeneous distribution of mTHPC in a murine tumor observed by two-color confocal fluorescence imaging and spectroscopy in a whole-mount model.

Authors:  Soumya Mitra; Estelle Maugain; Lina Bolotine; Francois Guillemin; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  Determination of the distribution of light, optical properties, drug concentration, and tissue oxygenation in-vivo in human prostate during motexafin lutetium-mediated photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Jarod C Finlay; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.252

10.  In vivo confocal fluorescence imaging of the intratumor distribution of the photosensitizer mono-L-aspartylchlorin-e6.

Authors:  Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.715

View more
  11 in total

1.  Three-dimensional fluence rate measurement and data acquisition system for minimally invasive light therapies.

Authors:  Benjamin Lai; Maxim Loshchenov; Alexander Douplik; Rob Rusnov; Marcos Jimenez-Davila; George Netchev; Lothar Lilge
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  Measuring the Physiologic Properties of Oral Lesions Receiving Fractionated Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Shannon M Gallagher-Colombo; Harry Quon; Kelly M Malloy; Peter H Ahn; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone; Ara A Chalian; Bert W O'Malley; Gregory S Weinstein; Timothy C Zhu; Mary E Putt; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Comparison of singlet oxygen threshold dose for PDT.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Baochang Liu; Michele M Kim; Dayton McMillan; Xing Liang; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-02-01

4.  In-vivo outcome study of HPPH mediated PDT using singlet oxygen explicit dosimetry (SOED).

Authors:  Rozhin Penjweini; Michele M Kim; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-02

5.  In-vivo singlet oxygen threshold doses for PDT.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Michele M Kim; Xing Liang; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Photonics Lasers Med       Date:  2015-02

6.  Explicit dosimetry for 2-(1-hexyloxyethyl)-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a-mediated photodynamic therapy: macroscopic singlet oxygen modeling.

Authors:  Rozhin Penjweini; Baochang Liu; Michele M Kim; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Explicit dosimetry for photodynamic therapy: macroscopic singlet oxygen modeling.

Authors:  Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch; Stephen M Hahn; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.207

8.  Explicit macroscopic singlet oxygen modeling for benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD)-mediated photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Rozhin Penjweini; Xing Liang; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 6.252

9.  Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer and for Infections: What Is the Difference?

Authors:  Sulbha K Sharma; Pawel Mroz; Tianhong Dai; Ying-Ying Huang; Tyler G St Denis; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Evaluation of the 2-(1-Hexyloxyethyl)-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide (HPPH) mediated photodynamic therapy by macroscopic singlet oxygen modeling.

Authors:  Rozhin Penjweini; Michele M Kim; Baochang Liu; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.