Literature DB >> 9375525

Toxicity and occupational health hazards of coal fly ash (CFA). A review of data and comparison to coal mine dust.

P J Borm1.   

Abstract

Coal fly ashes (CFA) are complex particles of a variable composition, which is mainly dependent on the combustion process, the source of coal and the precipitation technique. Toxic constituents in these particles are considered to be metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and silica. The purpose of this review was to study the in vitro and in vivo data on coal fly ash and relate the studied endpoints to the role of (crystalline) silica, considering its recent classification as a human carcinogen. For most of the effects coal mine dust was chosen as a reference, since it contains up to 10% of crystalline silica (alpha-quartz) and is well studied both in vivo and in vitro. Most studies on fly ash toxicity were not designed to elucidate the effect of its silica-content nor did they include coal mine dust as a reference. Taking this into account, both in vitro and in vivo experimental studies show lower toxicity, inflammatory potential and fibrogenicity of CFA compared to silica and coal mine dust. Although in vitro and in vivo studies suggest genotoxic effects of fly ash, the data are limited and do not clarify the role of silica. Epidemiological studies in fly ash exposed working populations have found no evidence for effects commonly seen in coal workers (pneumoconiosis, emphysema) with the exception of airway obstruction at high exposure. In conclusion, the available data suggest that the hazard of coal fly ash is not to be assessed by merely adding the hazards of individual components. A closer investigation of 'matrix' effects on silica's toxicity in general seems an obligatory step in future risk assessment on fly ashes and other particles that incorporate silica as a component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9375525     DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4878(97)00026-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  13 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by coal and coal fly ash particles samples in V79 cells.

Authors:  Grethel León-Mejía; Luis F O Silva; Matheus S Civeira; Marcos L S Oliveira; Miriana Machado; Izabel Vianna Villela; Andreas Hartmann; Suziane Premoli; Dione Silva Corrêa; Juliana Da Silva; João Antônio Pêgas Henriques
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Emission factors and particulate matter size distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from residential coal combustions in rural Northern China.

Authors:  Guofeng Shen; Wei Wang; Yifeng Yang; Chen Zhu; Yujia Min; Miao Xue; Junnan Ding; Wei Li; Bin Wang; Huizhong Shen; Rong Wang; Xilong Wang; Shu Tao
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods.

Authors:  Robert Tropek; Ilona Cerna; Jakub Straka; Petr Kocarek; Igor Malenovsky; Filip Tichanek; Pavel Sebek
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Enrichment and oral bioaccessibility of selected trace elements in fly ash-derived magnetic components.

Authors:  Anna Bourliva; Lambrini Papadopoulou; Elina Aidona; Konstantinos Simeonidis; George Vourlias; Eamonn Devlin; Yiannis Sanakis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Hexavalent chromium increases the metabolism and genotoxicity of aromatic amine carcinogens 4-aminobiphenyl and β-naphthylamine in immortalized human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  James T F Wise; Raúl A Salazar-González; Kennedy M Walls; Mark A Doll; Mariam R Habil; David W Hein
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Combustion-derived nanoparticles: a review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure.

Authors:  Ken Donaldson; Lang Tran; Luis Albert Jimenez; Rodger Duffin; David E Newby; Nicholas Mills; William MacNee; Vicki Stone
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 7.  Potential Occupational Exposures and Health Risks Associated with Biomass-Based Power Generation.

Authors:  Annette C Rohr; Sharan L Campleman; Christopher M Long; Michael K Peterson; Susan Weatherstone; Will Quick; Ari Lewis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  The Impact of Physical and Ergonomic Hazards on Poultry Abattoir Processing Workers: A Review.

Authors:  Johannes L Harmse; Jacobus C Engelbrecht; Johan L Bekker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Effects of Coal Fly Ash Particulate Matter on the Antimicrobial Activity of Airway Surface Liquid.

Authors:  Luis G Vargas Buonfiglio; Imali A Mudunkotuwa; Mahmoud H Abou Alaiwa; Oriana G Vanegas Calderón; Jennifer A Borcherding; Alicia K Gerke; Joseph Zabner; Vicki H Grassian; Alejandro P Comellas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Systems chemo-biology analysis of DNA damage response and cell cycle effects induced by coal exposure.

Authors:  Jose F Torres-Ávila; Lyda Espitia-Pérez; Diego Bonatto; Fernanda Rabaioli da Silva; Iuri Marques de Oliveira; Luís F O Silva; Dione Silva Corrêa; Johnny Ferraz Dias; Juliana da Silva; João Antonio Pêgas Henriques
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.771

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.