Literature DB >> 25847441

In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods.

Robert Tropek1,2,3, Ilona Cerna4,5, Jakub Straka6, Petr Kocarek7, Igor Malenovsky8, Filip Tichanek5, Pavel Sebek4,5.   

Abstract

Recently, fly ash deposits have been revealed as a secondary refuge of critically endangered arthropods specialised on aeolian sands in Central Europe. Simultaneously, these anthropogenic habitats are well known for their negative impact on human health and the surrounding environment. The overwhelming majority of these risks are caused by wind erosion, the substantial decreasing of which is thus necessary. But, any effects of anti-dust treatments on endangered arthropods have never been studied. We surveyed communities of five arthropod groups (wild bees and wasps, leafhoppers, spiders, hoverflies and orthopteroid insects) colonising three fly ash deposits in the western Czech Republic. We focused on two different anti-dust treatments (~70 and 100 % cover of fly ash by barren soil) and their comparison with a control of bare fly ash. Altogether, we recorded 495 species, including 132 nationally threatened species (eight of them were considered to be extinct in the country) and/or 30 species strictly specialised to drift sands. Bees and wasps and leafhoppers contained the overwhelming majority of species of the highest conservation interest; a few other important records were also in spiders and orthopteroids. Total soil cover depleted the unique environment of fly ash and thus destroyed the high conservation potential of the deposits. On the other hand, partial coverage (with ~30 % of bare fly ash) still offered habitats for many of the most threatened species, as we showed by both regression and multivariate analyses, with a decrease of wind erosion. This topic still needs much more research interest, but we consider mosaic-like preservation of smaller spots of fly ash as one of the possible compromises between biodiversity and human health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aculeata; Araneae; Auchenorrhyncha; Coal combustion; Human-made habitats; Orthoptera; Restoration ecology; Syrphidae

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25847441     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Indian perspective of utilizing fly ash in phytoremediation, phytomanagement and biomass production.

Authors:  Vimal Chandra Pandey; P C Abhilash; Nandita Singh
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 2.  Reclamation and revegetation of fly ash disposal sites - Challenges and research needs.

Authors:  R J Haynes
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 3.  Toxicity and occupational health hazards of coal fly ash (CFA). A review of data and comparison to coal mine dust.

Authors:  P J Borm
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1997-12

4.  Nanominerals and nanoparticles in feed coal and bottom ash: implications for human health effects.

Authors:  Luis F O Silva; Kátia M da Boit
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Acute pulmonary and systemic effects of inhaled coal fly ash in rats: comparison to ambient environmental particles.

Authors:  Kevin R Smith; John M Veranth; Urmila P Kodavanti; Ann E Aust; Kent E Pinkerton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 4.849

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  How can we restore biodiversity and ecosystem services in mining and industrial sites?

Authors:  Karel Prach; Anne Tolvanen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The association of windmills with conservation of pollinating insects and wild plants in homogeneous farmland of western Poland.

Authors:  Sylwia Pustkowiak; Weronika Banaszak-Cibicka; Łukasz Emil Mielczarek; Piotr Tryjanowski; Piotr Skórka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.