Literature DB >> 9374984

Clinical outcome measures and rating scales in multiple sclerosis trials.

D M Wingerchuk1, J H Noseworthy, B G Weinshenker.   

Abstract

In this review, we analyzed clinical outcome measures used in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials in which the primary goal is to slow or arrest progression of disease. In addition, we examined rating scales that quantify symptomatic complications of MS (for example, spasticity) and the current role of magnetic resonance imaging in MS treatment trials. Each proposed scale has advantages and deficiencies, and none meets all the criteria for an ideal outcome measure. The validity of trial design may be improved by using combinations of selected components of current scales as well as new instruments targeted to specific variables (such as motor strength). Symptom-specific rating scales are most appropriately used in trials of symptomatic therapeutic strategies for MS. Until serial magnetic resonance imaging changes are definitely known to predict long-term impairment and disability in patients with MS, clinical outcome measures will remain the primary means of assessing therapeutic efficacy in phase III clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9374984     DOI: 10.4065/72.11.1070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  8 in total

1.  Outcome expectations and physical activity in persons with longstanding multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Janet D Morrison; Alexa K Stuifbergen
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.230

2.  Disability outcome measures in therapeutic trials of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: effects of heterogeneity of disease course in placebo cohorts.

Authors:  C Liu; L D Blumhardt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis analysed by area under disability/time curves.

Authors:  C Liu; L D Blumhardt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Corpus callosum damage predicts disability progression and cognitive dysfunction in primary-progressive MS after five years.

Authors:  Benedetta Bodini; Mara Cercignani; Zhaleh Khaleeli; David H Miller; Maria Ron; Sophie Penny; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  A novel approach with "skeletonised MTR" measures tract-specific microstructural changes in early primary-progressive MS.

Authors:  Benedetta Bodini; Mara Cercignani; Ahmed Toosy; Nicola De Stefano; David H Miller; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Predictors of Fatigue Impact in Persons With Long-Standing Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Janet D Morrison; Alexa K Stuifbergen
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.230

7.  Self-report versus performance measure in gauging level of function with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alexa K Stuifbergen; Marian Morris; Heather Becker; Lynn Chen; Hwa Young Lee
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.554

8.  Temporal and spatial evolution of grey matter atrophy in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Arman Eshaghi; Benedetta Bodini; Gerard R Ridgway; Daniel García-Lorenzo; Daniel J Tozer; Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.556

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.