Literature DB >> 10486390

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis analysed by area under disability/time curves.

C Liu1, L D Blumhardt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The commonly employed outcome measures on disability and relapse rates in treatment trials of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have well demonstrated sensitivity to treatment effects, but their clinical interpretation is problematic. An alternative method of analysis, which is more clinically meaningful and statistically appropriate to a condition with a fluctuating disease course, uses the summary measure statistic "area under the disability/time curve (AUC)", to estimate each patient's total in trial morbidity experience.
METHODS: The AUC technique was applied in an intention to treat analysis of serial disability data derived from the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), the Scripps neurologic rating scale (SNRS), and the ambulation index (AI), collected during a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, phase III trial of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (INFbeta-1a) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (PRISMS Study). The results were compared with the often quoted "conventional" end point of mean change in rating scores from baseline to trial completion. Analyses were also carried out on subgroups with entry EDSS stratified above and below 3.5.
RESULTS: EDSS data analysed by AUC normalised to baseline scores disclosed that both doses of IFNbeta-1a (22 or 44 microg) were superior to placebo (p= 0.008 and 0.013, respectively). In addition, the high dose (44 microg) was more beneficial than placebo using SNRS (p= 0.038) and AI data (p= 0.039). AUC analysis of SNRS scores also showed that for patients with baseline EDSS>3.5, the 44 microg (but not the 22 microg) dose was more advantageous than placebo (p=0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: Summary measure analysis using the AUC of serial disability/time plots, confirms and extends the results of conventional end point analysis of disability from the PRISMS Study data. AUC evaluations show that high dose INFbeta-1a (44 microg three times weekly) was beneficial on all of the clinical rating scale scores used in this study. This method provides a statistically powerful and clinically meaningful assessment of treatment effects on in trial disability in patients with multiple sclerosis with fluctuating and highly heterogeneous disease courses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10486390      PMCID: PMC1736573          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.67.4.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  27 in total

1.  The measurement of ambulatory impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  S R Schwid; A D Goodman; D H Mattson; C Mihai; K M Donohoe; M D Petrie; E A Scheid; J T Dudman; M P McDermott
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Clinical outcome measures and rating scales in multiple sclerosis trials.

Authors:  D M Wingerchuk; J H Noseworthy; B G Weinshenker
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: a critical analysis.

Authors:  J N Whitaker; H F McFarland; P Rudge; S C Reingold
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Recommendations from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force.

Authors:  R Rudick; J Antel; C Confavreux; G Cutter; G Ellison; J Fischer; F Lublin; A Miller; J Petkau; S Rao; S Reingold; K Syndulko; A Thompson; J Wallenberg; B Weinshenker; E Willoughby
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury.

Authors:  D Gronwall; P Wrightson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-09-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, three-arm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTH.

Authors:  S L Hauser; D M Dawson; J R Lehrich; M F Beal; S V Kevy; R D Propper; J A Mills; H L Weiner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A neurologic rating scale (NRS) for use in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J C Sipe; R L Knobler; S L Braheny; G P Rice; H S Panitch; M B Oldstone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Randomised placebo-controlled trial of monthly intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Austrian Immunoglobulin in Multiple Sclerosis Study Group.

Authors:  F Fazekas; F Deisenhammer; S Strasser-Fuchs; G Nahler; B Mamoli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests.

Authors:  D E Goodkin; D Hertsgaard; J Seminary
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).

Authors:  J F Kurtzke
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Interferon β for multiple sclerosis. How much is good enough?].

Authors:  C Warnke; V I Leussink; B C Kieseier; H-P Hartung
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Issues for clinical drug development in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Michel Dib
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Long-term treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon-beta may be cost effective.

Authors:  M Kendrick; K I Johnson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Identification of targets and new developments in the treatment of multiple sclerosis--focus on cladribine.

Authors:  Clemens Warnke; Heinz Wiendl; Hans-Peter Hartung; Olaf Stüve; Bernd C Kieseier
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Comparative efficacy of switching to natalizumab in active multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Timothy Spelman; Tomas Kalincik; Annie Zhang; Fabio Pellegrini; Heinz Wiendl; Ludwig Kappos; Larisa Tsvetkova; Shibeshih Belachew; Robert Hyde; Freek Verheul; Francois Grand-Maison; Guillermo Izquierdo; Pierre Grammond; Pierre Duquette; Alessandra Lugaresi; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Celia Oreja-Guevara; Raymond Hupperts; Thor Petersen; Michael Barnett; Maria Trojano; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.511

6.  Interferon-β corrects massive gene dysregulation in multiple sclerosis: Short-term and long-term effects on immune regulation and neuroprotection.

Authors:  Xuan Feng; Riyue Bao; Lei Li; Florian Deisenhammer; Barry G W Arnason; Anthony T Reder
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Review of the clinical evidence for interferon beta 1a (Rebif) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Francesco Manfredonia; Livia Pasquali; Angela Dardano; Alfonso Iudice; Luigi Murri; Fabio Monzani
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 8.  Newer therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alasdair Coles
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.383

9.  Diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis in patients with multiple sclerosis, expert consensus. On behalf of the Colombian Association of Neurology, Committee of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Carlos Navas; Carlos A Torres-Duque; Joe Munoz-Ceron; Carlos Álvarez; Juan R García; Luis Zarco; Lázaro A Vélez; Carlos Awad; Carlos Alberto Castro
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2018-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.