Literature DB >> 9374299

Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance.

L L Lo1, R L Fernando, M Grossman.   

Abstract

To obtain estimates of breeding values by BLUP using Henderson's mixed-model equations, it is necessary to invert the covariance matrix for each random effect in the model. In a model in which the genotypic value is included as a random effect (genotypic model), it is necessary to invert the genotypic covariance matrix. Under additive inheritance, the inverse of the genotypic covariance matrix can be computed efficiently. Under dominance inheritance, however, an efficient method to invert the genotypic covariance matrix has not yet been developed, especially for crossbred populations. Thus, the use of a genotypic model for BLUP is not suitable for genetic evaluation in large, crossbred populations. We present an equivalent model in which the genotypic effect is partitioned into additive and dominance effects. With this equivalent model, methods used for within-breed genetic evaluation by BLUP can be used for a two-breed terminal cross under dominance.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9374299     DOI: 10.2527/1997.75112877x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Authors:  J-M Bouvet; G Makouanzi; D Cros; Ph Vigneron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance.

Authors:  Noelia Ibánez-Escriche; Rohan L Fernando; Ali Toosi; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.

Authors:  Hadi Esfandyari; Dinesh Thekkoot; Robert Kemp; Graham Plastow; Jack Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.

Authors:  Tao Xiang; Ole Fredslund Christensen; Zulma Gladis Vitezica; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Predicting the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from the genetic variance components in the parental lines.

Authors:  Pascal Duenk; Piter Bijma; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Genomic evaluation of both purebred and crossbred performances.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Per Madsen; Bjarne Nielsen; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Selecting the quality of mule duck fatty liver based on near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christel Marie-Etancelin; Zulma G Vitezica; Laurent Bonnal; Xavier Fernandez; Denis Bastianelli
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Jean-Michel Elsen; Ignacy Misztal; William Herring; Andrès Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.297

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.