| Literature DB >> 937409 |
H K Light, J S Solheim, G W Hunter.
Abstract
Societal attitudes toward the medical profession are apparently undergoing a change from awe and total respect to a more critical assessing of accountability and credibility. Based on mass media reports and the increasing number of malpractice suits, it would appear that a rational, unbiased review of medical doctors, hospital personnel, and care received is in order. This review should be concerned with technical aspects of medicine as determined by highly competent professionals and the consumer's view of the medical care he receives. The latter review should logically be taken directly to the consumers of medical care to determine their satisfaction with the care they received. Because of the varied areas of specialty within the medical profession, there are different types of relationships between doctors and their patients. The obstetrician, for instance, is usually associated with pregnancy as a joyful event, in contrast to a surgeon whose diagnosis may seldom be accompanied by joy. Satisfaction with medical care could thus be expected to vary according to the area of specialty and may be related to factors over which doctors have no control, factors which initially bring the patient to the doctor for care. The degree of anxiety related to the patient's condition could also be expected to contribute to the degree of satisfaction expressed by the patient.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1976 PMID: 937409 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90858-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 0002-9378 Impact factor: 8.661