Literature DB >> 3567764

Changes in the management of labour: 2. Perineal management.

J L Reynolds, P L Yudkin.   

Abstract

An analysis of 24,439 deliveries between 1980 and 1984 in a large British obstetric unit showed a striking decline in the rate of episiotomy. The rates of first- and second-degree perineal tears increased during the study period, but overall there was a significant rise in the proportion of women who gave birth with an intact perineum (p less than 0.001). There was no increase in the rate of third-degree tears or of other perineal complications. Delivery with an intact perineum was more likely among younger women, those with a short second stage of labour and those with a small baby (p less than 0.001). These findings confirm the short-term safety of lowering episiotomy rates and should be helpful to all obstetric professionals in reducing unnecessary perineal morbidity among childbearing women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3567764      PMCID: PMC1492550     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  12 in total

1.  Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring.

Authors:  H D Banta; S B Thacker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 2.347

2.  Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Setchell; M Swash; M M Henry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Satisfaction with medical care during pregnancy and delivery.

Authors:  H K Light; J S Solheim; G W Hunter
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Commentaries: British debate on obstetric practice.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Episiotomy and third-degree tears.

Authors:  P Buekens; R Lagasse; M Dramaix; E Wollast
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-08

6.  Is routine episiotomy necessary?

Authors:  R F Harrison; M Brennan; P M North; J V Reed; E A Wickham
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-30

7.  West Berkshire perineal management trial.

Authors:  J Sleep; A Grant; J Garcia; D Elbourne; J Spencer; I Chalmers
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-08

8.  How women view postepisiotomy pain.

Authors:  A E Reading; C M Sledmere; D N Cox; S Campbell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-01-23

9.  Episiotomy: who gets one and why.

Authors:  M B Jackson; G D Dunster
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-11

10.  Pain after episiotomy--a comparison of two methods of repair.

Authors:  P C Buchan; J A Nicholls
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1980-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Obstetric audit using routinely collected computerised data.

Authors:  P L Yudkin; C W Redman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-15

2.  Episiotomy: Differences in practice between family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  J Ruderman; J C Carroli; A J Reid; M A Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Influence of perinatal asphyxia on neurologic outcome: consequences for family practice accoucheurs.

Authors:  M Klein; J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Episiotomy and the second stage of labour.

Authors:  M Klein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Pattern of episiotomy use & its immediate complications among vaginal deliveries in 18 tertiary care hospitals in India.

Authors:  Shalini Singh; Tushita Thakur; Nomita Chandhiok; Balwan Singh Dhillon
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.