Literature DB >> 937314

Evaluation of gastric ulcerations.

R S Nelson, L H Urrea, F L Lanza.   

Abstract

All gastric ulcers diagnosed during the period November, 1969-May, 1974, were prospectively evaluated by roentgenography, fiberoptic gastroscopy, directed biopsy, and brush cytology. Gastroscopy was performed routinely in patients with radiologic diagnosis of gastric ulcer or questionable findings, and in symptomatic individuals with negative roentgenograms. A total of 123/142 ulcers, 109 benign, 14 malignant, were available for complete follow-up. Gastroscopy was correct in 106 of 109 benign ulcers visualized. Roentgenoscopy demonstrated 91 of 109, of which 7 were incorrectly called carcinoma. Gross diagnosis was correct by gastroscopy in 11 of 14 malignant ulcers. Radiology visualized 6 of 14; gross diagnosis was correct in 1 of 6 (5 called benign). Directed gastroscopic biopsy was negative for malignant changes in all 109 benign and 3 of 14 malignant ulcers. Total complete gastroscopic diagnostic failures were 4 of 123, for an overall accuracy of 96.7%. Overall roentgenographic accuracy was 70.8%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 937314     DOI: 10.1007/bf01072661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dig Dis        ISSN: 0002-9211


  11 in total

1.  The combined radiologic and gastroscopic evaluation of gastric ulceration.

Authors:  G D DODD; R S NELSON
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Problem of the gastric ulcer reviewed: study of one thousand cases.

Authors:  F H SMITH; R S BOLES; S M JORDAN
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1953-12-26

3.  Gastroscopic diagnosis in 273 gastric ulcers.

Authors:  R SCHINDLER; J J DESNEUX
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1953-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Gastroscopy and photography are not enough. The importance of cytologic and histologic diagnosis in gastric ulcer.

Authors:  J Wenger; J Del Mazo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Gastric ulcer. I. Analysis of 701 patients.

Authors:  C Fenger; E Amdrup; P Christiansen; H E Jensen; J Lindskov; J Nielsen; S A Damgaard Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1973

6.  Gastroscopy with biopsy and cytological sampling under direct vision.

Authors:  D G Williams; S C Truelove; M W Gear; G R Massarella; N W Fitzgerald
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-03-02

7.  The gastroscopic yield from the negative upper gastrointestinal series.

Authors:  B M Schuman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Gastric Ulcer. 9. Gastroscopy.

Authors:  R C Fruin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Experience with conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a 13-year study.

Authors:  G L McBroom
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Direct vision gastric biopsy using the Machida FGS-B6 gastroscope.

Authors:  J B Weiss; M J Gang; T J Ekkers; H P Gaetz; R S McCray
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  3 in total

1.  Current diagnosis and selection of patients for treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  R Gugler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. I. Upper gastrointestinal examination.

Authors:  D W Gelfand; D J Ott; R Tritico
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30

3.  Gastric adenocarcinoma masquerading endoscopically as benign gastric ulcer. A five-year experience.

Authors:  I Podolsky; P R Storms; C T Richardson; W L Peterson; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.