Literature DB >> 4053923

Current diagnosis and selection of patients for treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

R Gugler.   

Abstract

The introduction of fiberoptic endoscopy has altered the relative importance of ulcer symptoms in the diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Interestingly, we now realize that 50% of ulcer patients do not have the classical ulcer symptoms and that 25% of peptic ulcers are asymptomatic. Modern forward-viewing endoscopes of small diameter enable precise diagnosis with little discomfort in 95% of all duodenal ulcer patients. A biopsy is only recommended in rare cases (giant ulcers) because the malignancy rate is only 0.024% in duodenal ulcers. The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy in detecting gastric ulcer is as high as that for duodenal ulcer, but for this ulcer type it is absolutely necessary to exclude malignancy by obtaining a minimum of six biopsies (four from the ulcer margin and two from the ulcer base), since approximately 10% of all gastric ulcers are actually carcinomas. Whereas in duodenal ulcer repeat endoscopy is seldom necessary, it is mandatory in gastric ulcer since ulcer healing is not proof of a benign ulcer. In experienced hands endoscopy is superior to radiography in duodenal and in gastric ulcer, although there is still a place for radiography as a supplementary investigation or if the patient rejects endoscopy. When selecting patients for treatment of peptic ulcer the following aspects must be considered: natural history of the disease, effectiveness of treatment, and risks and costs of treatment. Treatment goals (relief of symptoms, ulcer healing) can be achieved as far as the acute ulcer is concerned but as yet we have no evidence that we can cure chronic ulcer disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4053923     DOI: 10.1007/BF01309382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

1.  GASTRIC ULCERS, BLOOD GROUPS, AND ACID SECRETION.

Authors:  H D JOHNSON; A H LOVE; N C ROGERS; A P WYATT
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Demonstration of a new gastroscope, the fiberscope.

Authors:  B I HIRSCHOWITZ; L E CURTISS; C W PETERS; H M POLLARD
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Gastric ulcer and cancer.

Authors:  R D Montgomery; B P Richardson
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1975-10

4.  Clinical picture of peptic ulceration diagnosed endoscopically.

Authors:  M C Sheppard; G K Holmes; R Cockel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  [Frequency of surgery in ulcer after the introduction of H2-blockers].

Authors:  R Gugler; H G Rohner
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1984-07-13       Impact factor: 0.628

6.  The endoscopic, radiological, and surgical findings in chronic duodenal ulceration.

Authors:  P Brown; P R Salmon; R J Burwood; A J Knox; B G Clendinnen; A E Read
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  "Skinny" upper gastrointestinal endoscopy--the initial diagnostic tool: a prospective comparison of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiology.

Authors:  F J Tedesco; J W Griffin; W L Crisp; H F Anthony
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  [Endoscopic and radiological diagnosis of ulcer or scarring of the duodenal bulb].

Authors:  S Jenny; P Frühmorgen; M Classen; H Bauerle; L Demling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1972-01-28       Impact factor: 0.628

9.  A comparison of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiography.

Authors:  T R Martin; J A Vennes; S E Silvis; H J Ansel
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  How reliable is determination of ulcer size by endoscopy?

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; M Giger; L Kern; C Noll; K Study; K B Weber; A L Blum
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-11-24
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Gastric tube perforation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ubukata; Takeshi Nakachi; Takanobu Tabuchi; Hiroyuki Nagata; Akira Takemura; Jiro Shimazaki; Satoru Konishi; Takafumi Tabuchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.