Literature DB >> 9371665

Delayed xenograft rejection of pig-to-baboon cardiac transplants after cobra venom factor therapy.

T Kobayashi1, S Taniguchi, F A Neethling, A G Rose, W W Hancock, Y Ye, M Niekrasz, S Kosanke, L J Wright, D J White, D K Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to (i) investigate the efficacy of cobra venom factor (CVF) in preventing hyperacute rejection (HAR) after pig-to-baboon heart transplantation, (ii) examine the effect of additional splenectomy (Spx) and pharmacologic immunosuppression (IS), and (iii) study delayed graft rejection when HAR is avoided by complement depletion.
METHODS: Eleven recipient baboons received heterotopic pig heart transplants. Three received either no therapy or IS (cyclosporine + methylprednisolone +/- cyclophosphamide +/- methotrexate) at clinically well-tolerated doses, with graft survival for only 40, 32, and 15 min, respectively. Two received CVF+/-Spx, which extended survival to 5 and 6 days, respectively. Six underwent Spx + CVF therapy + IS; graft survival was 3 hr (technical complication), 6 days (death from sepsis), 10, 12, and 22 days (vascular rejection), and <25 days (euthanized for viral pneumonia with a functioning graft that showed histopathologic features of vascular rejection).
RESULTS: Dense deposition of IgM and, to a lesser extent, IgG and IgA were seen on the endothelial cells within 1 hr of transplantation, but only trace levels of complement deposition were present in CVF-treated recipients. Within approximately 5-12 days, cardiac xenografts showed progressive infiltration by mononuclear cells, consisting primarily of activated macrophages producing tumor necrosis factor-alpha and small numbers of natural killer cells; T and B cells were absent.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (i) CVF prevents HAR, (ii) the addition of Spx + IS delays rejection, but (iii) the early deposition of antibody leads to progressive graft injury, resulting in (iv) delayed vascular rejection. Our findings indicate that the features of delayed xenograft rejection described in small animal models also occur in the pig-to-baboon model, and that rejection may occur in a complement-independent manner from the effects of antibody and/or host macrophages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9371665     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199711150-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  18 in total

Review 1.  Current status of pig heart xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Muhammad M Mohiuddin; Bruno Reichart; Guerard W Byrne; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Rejection severity directly correlates with myocyte apoptosis in pig-to-baboon cardiac xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Joel G R Weaver; Christopher G A McGregor; Henry D Tazelaar; Andrew D Badley
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 3.  Antibody-mediated xenograft injury: mechanisms and protective strategies.

Authors:  Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 1.708

Review 4.  Immunological challenges and therapies in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Marta Vadori; Emanuele Cozzi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Therapeutic regulation of systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients.

Authors:  Hayato Iwase; Hong Liu; Tao Li; Zhongquiang Zhang; Bingsi Gao; Hidetaka Hara; Martin Wijkstrom; Cassandra Long; Ryan Saari; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Mohamed B Ezzelarab
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 6.  New concepts of immune modulation in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Vikas Satyananda; Hidetaka Hara; Mohamed B Ezzelarab; Carol Phelps; David Ayares; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  The role of antibodies in acute vascular rejection of pig-to-baboon cardiac transplants.

Authors:  S S Lin; B C Weidner; G W Byrne; L E Diamond; J H Lawson; C W Hoopes; L J Daniels; C W Daggett; W Parker; R C Harland; R D Davis; R R Bollinger; J S Logan; J L Platt
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Overcoming the barriers to xenotransplantation: prospects for the future.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  Activation of cytomegalovirus in pig-to-primate organ xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Nicolas J Mueller; Rolf N Barth; Shin Yamamoto; Hiroshi Kitamura; Clive Patience; Kazuhiko Yamada; David K C Cooper; David H Sachs; Amitinder Kaur; Jay A Fishman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 10.  Immunobiological barriers to xenotransplantation.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 6.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.