Literature DB >> 9370505

Impact of a clinical guidelines program for breast and colon cancer in a French cancer center.

I Ray-Coquard1, T Philip, M Lehmann, B Fervers, F Farsi, F Chauvin.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Between 1993 and 1994, the 80 physicians in the French comprehensive cancer center, Léon Bérard, developed and implemented a Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) project based on an analysis of the literature and a consensus of intrainstitutional experts.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this project are to assist community-based oncologists in their decision making and to minimize inappropriate variation in practices. A study was designed to assess the impact of CPGs on management of breast and colon cancer.
DESIGN: A "before-after" study, using institutional computerized records of patients with breast or colon cancer.
SETTING: Records for 100 women with localized breast cancer were randomly selected from those available in 1993 and 1995, and those for all patients newly referred with colon cancer in 1993 and 1995 (77 and 81 patients, respectively). Medical decisions on these records were analyzed to assess their compliance with the CPGs. (A systematic search of the literature was performed to determine the scientific evidence for noncompliant decisions.)
RESULTS: Of 375 available medical decisions, 350 were assessable. The compliance rate with CPGs for breast cancer was significantly higher in 1995 compared with 1993, 54% (54/99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-64%) vs 19% (18/95; 95% CI, 11%-27%) (P<.001). The compliance rate for colon cancer was also significantly higher in 1995 than in 1993, 70% (62/88; 95% CI, 60%-80%) vs 50% (34/ 68; 95% CI, 38%-62%) (P=.009). In 1993, 42% (40/95; 95% CI, 32%-52%) of medical decisions for breast cancer and in 1995, 68% (67/99; 95% CI, 59%-77%) conformed with the CPGs or were judged to be based on "scientific evidence." In 1993, 71% (48/68; 95% CI, 60%-81%) of medical decisions for colon cancer, and in 1995 81% (71/88; 95% CI, 73%-89%) conformed with the CPGs or were judged to be based on scientific evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Compliance rates were significantly higher in 1995 for both cancers. The development and implementation of CPGs for cancer management seem to result in significant changes in medical practice, although a causal relationship between changes and CPGs is not demonstrated in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9370505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  21 in total

1.  Frequency of adoption of practice management guidelines at trauma centers.

Authors:  Justin Sobrino; Sunni A Barnes; Nadine Dahr; Rustam Kudyakov; Candice Berryman; Avery B Nathens; Mark R Hemmila; Melanie Neal; Shahid Shafi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use.

Authors:  Margaret B Harrison; France Légaré; Ian D Graham; Béatrice Fervers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Promise and perils of guidelines in quality cancer care.

Authors:  Blair Irwin; Jeffrey Peppercorn
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Impact of guidelines implemented in a paris university hospital: application to the use of antiemetics by cancer patients.

Authors:  I Debrix; A Flahault; A Becker; L Schwartz; A Kanfer; B Milleron
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  A European project on incidence, treatment, and outcome of sarcoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Emanuela Fadda; Luca Cegolon; Maria C Montesco; Isabel Ray-Coquard; Alessandra Buja; Ugo Fedeli; Alvise Frasson; Paolo Spolaore; Carlo R Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Territorial inequalities in management and conformity to clinical guidelines for sarcoma patients: an exhaustive population-based cohort analysis in the Rhône-Alpes region.

Authors:  Pierre Etienne Heudel; Philippe Cousin; Antoine Lurkin; Claire Cropet; Françoise Ducimetiere; Olivier Collard; Guy De Laroche; Pierre Biron; Pierre Meeus; Philippe Thiesse; Christophe Bergeron; Gualter Vaz; François Mithieux; Fadila Farsi; Yohan Fayet; François-Noel Gilly; Dominic Cellier; Jean-Yves Blay; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Strategies for reducing regional variation in the use of surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Sarah P Shubeck; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions.

Authors:  Lionel Perrier; Alessandra Buja; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Antonella Vecchiato; Paolo Sandonà; Françoise Ducimetière; Jean-Yves Blay; François Noël Gilly; Carole Siani; Pierre Biron; Dominique Ranchère-Vince; Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere; Philippe Thiesse; Christophe Bergeron; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Jean-Michel Coindre; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  European cooperation for clinical practice guidelines in cancer.

Authors:  T Philip; B Fervers; M Haugh; R Otter; G Browman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Compliance with clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer treatment: a population-based study of quality-of-care indicators in Italy.

Authors:  Carlotta Sacerdote; Rita Bordon; Sabina Pitarella; Maria Piera Mano; Ileana Baldi; Denise Casella; Daniela Di Cuonzo; Alfonso Frigerio; Luisella Milanesio; Franco Merletti; Eva Pagano; Fulvio Ricceri; Stefano Rosso; Nereo Segnan; Mariano Tomatis; Giovannino Ciccone; Paolo Vineis; Antonio Ponti
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.