Literature DB >> 9369810

Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery.

V Berghella1, J E Tolosa, K Kuhlman, S Weiner, R J Bolognese, R J Wapner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the accuracy of ultrasonographic and manual cervical examinations for the prediction of preterm delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred two singleton pregnancies at high risk for preterm delivery were followed up prospectively from 14 to 30 weeks with both serial cervical ultrasonography measurements and manual examinations of the length of the cervix. The primary outcome studied was preterm (< 35 weeks) delivery.
RESULTS: Excluding six induced preterm deliveries, 96 pregnancies were analyzed. The mean cervical length measured by ultrasonography was 20.6 mm in pregnancies delivered preterm (n = 17) and 31.3 mm in pregnancies delivered at term (n = 79) (p = 0.003); the mean cervical lengths measured by manual examination were 16.1 mm and 18.6 mm in the same preterm and term pregnancies, respectively (not significant). The sixteenth- and twentieth-week ultrasonographic cervical lengths predicted preterm delivery most accurately (p < 0.0005). The 25th percentiles of ultrasonographic (25 mm) and manual (16 mm) cervical lengths showed relative risks for preterm delivery of 4.8 (95% confidence interval 2.1 to 11.1, p = 0.0004) and 2.0 (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 4.7, p = 0.1), respectively; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 59%, 85%, 45%, 91%, and 41%, 77%, 28%, and 86%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Cervical length measured by ultrasonography is a better predictor of preterm delivery than is cervical length measured by manual examination. Cervical ultrasonography in patients at high risk for preterm birth seems to be most predictive of preterm delivery when it is performed between 14 and 22 weeks' gestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9369810     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70259-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of the POP-Q examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and direct anatomic measurement of cervical length.

Authors:  Christina E Dancz; Lisa Werth; Vanessa Sun; Sandy Lee; Daphne Walker; Begüm Özel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Management of pregnancies with cervical shortening: a very short cervix is a very big problem.

Authors:  Hee Joong Lee; Tae Chul Park; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful?

Authors:  Joel D Larma; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Gestational age at previous preterm birth does not affect cerclage efficacy.

Authors:  Deborah A Wing; Jeff Szychowski; John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Vincenzo Berghella; Edwin R Guzman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Timing of mid-trimester cervical length shortening in high-risk women.

Authors:  J M Szychowski; J Owen; G Hankins; J Iams; J Sheffield; A Perez-Delboy; V Berghella; D A Wing; E R Guzman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The effect of treatment with 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on changes in cervical length over time.

Authors:  Celeste P Durnwald; Courtney D Lynch; Hetty Walker; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Serial cervical length determination in twin pregnancies reveals 4 distinct patterns with prognostic significance for preterm birth.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Alex Pittini; Liran Hiersch; Yariv Yogev; Steven S Korzeniewski; Roberto Romero; Jon Barrett
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Do serial measurements of cervical length improve the prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with twin gestations?

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Alex Pittini; Liran Hiersch; Yariv Yogev; Steven J Korzeniewski; Roberto Romero; Jon Barrett
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.