Literature DB >> 19072745

Timing of mid-trimester cervical length shortening in high-risk women.

J M Szychowski1, J Owen, G Hankins, J Iams, J Sheffield, A Perez-Delboy, V Berghella, D A Wing, E R Guzman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the natural history of cervical length shortening in women who had experienced at least one prior spontaneous preterm birth at between 17+0 and 33+6 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: This was an analysis of prerandomization data from the multicenter Vaginal Ultrasound Cerclage Trial. Serial cervical length was measured by transvaginal sonography in 1014 high-risk women at 16+0 to 22+6 weeks. We performed survival analyses in which the outcome was cervical length shortening<25 mm and data were censored if this did not occur before 22+6 weeks' gestation. The incidence of cervical length shortening and the time to shortening were compared for women whose earliest prior preterm birth was in the mid-trimester, defined as <24 weeks, vs. those at weeks 24-33. Similar comparisons were performed based on each patient's most recent birth history.
RESULTS: Time to cervical length shortening by survival analysis was significantly shorter (hazard ratio (HR)=2.2, P<0.0001) and the relative risk (RR) of shortening significantly higher (RR=1.8, P<0.0001) for women whose earliest prior spontaneous preterm birth was at <24 weeks. A larger effect was observed for women whose most recent birth was at <24 weeks (HR=2.8, P<0.0001; RR=2.1, P<0.0001). The observed hazard ratios remained significant after adjusting for confounders in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.
CONCLUSION: Women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth at <24 weeks are at a higher risk of cervical shortening, and do so at a higher rate and at an earlier gestational age, than do women with a later preterm birth history. Copyright (c) 2008 ISUOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19072745      PMCID: PMC3065937          DOI: 10.1002/uog.6283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  19 in total

Review 1.  The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Jimmy Espinoza; Offer Erez; Sonia Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Recurrence risk for preterm delivery.

Authors:  Julie McManemy; Erinn Cooke; Erol Amon; Terry Leet
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Prevention of premature birth.

Authors:  R L Goldenberg; D J Rouse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The Preterm Prediction Study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network.

Authors:  J D Iams; R L Goldenberg; B M Mercer; A Moawad; E Thom; P J Meis; D McNellis; S N Caritis; M Miodovnik; M K Menard; G R Thurnau; S E Bottoms; J M Roberts
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery.

Authors:  V Berghella; J E Tolosa; K Kuhlman; S Weiner; R J Bolognese; R J Wapner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Second-trimester cervical ultrasound: associations with increased risk for recurrent early spontaneous delivery.

Authors:  W W Andrews; R Copper; J C Hauth; R L Goldenberg; C Neely; M Dubard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Racial disparity in the frequency of recurrence of preterm birth.

Authors:  Zachary A-F Kistka; Lisanne Palomar; Kirstin A Lee; Sarah E Boslaugh; Michael F Wangler; F Sessions Cole; Michael R DeBaun; Louis J Muglia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Hsiang-Ching Kung; T J Mathews; Donna L Hoyert; Donna M Strobino; Bernard Guyer; Shae R Sutton
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network.

Authors:  J D Iams; R L Goldenberg; P J Meis; B M Mercer; A Moawad; A Das; E Thom; D McNellis; R L Copper; F Johnson; J M Roberts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-02-29       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss in women.

Authors:  A J Drakeley; D Roberts; Z Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

2.  Gestational age at previous preterm birth does not affect cerclage efficacy.

Authors:  Deborah A Wing; Jeff Szychowski; John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Vincenzo Berghella; Edwin R Guzman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-06

4.  Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length.

Authors:  John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Vincenzo Berghella; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Robert S Egerman; Deborah A Wing; Mark Tomlinson; Richard Silver; Susan M Ramin; Edwin R Guzman; Michael Gordon; Helen Y How; Eric J Knudtson; Jeff M Szychowski; Suzanne Cliver; John C Hauth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Health disparities in risk for cervical insufficiency.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Haywood L Brown; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Cervical length measurement: Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approach.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway; Lars Henning Pedersen; Jon Hyett
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  Can the cervical length in mid-trimester predict the use of vacuum in vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Jee Yoon Park; Sun Min Kim; Jeenah Sohn; Sejin Kim; Eunjin Song; Byoung Jae Kim; Hye Won Jeon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.