Literature DB >> 9369456

Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior.

P Marler1.   

Abstract

Research on avian song learning has traditionally been based on an instructional model, as exemplified by the sensorimotor model of song development. Several large-scale, species-wide field studies of learned birdsongs have revealed that variation is narrowly restricted to certain aspects of song structure. Other aspects are sufficiently stereotyped and so widely shared by species' members that they qualify as species-specific universals. The limitations on natural song variation are difficult to reconcile with a fully open, instructive model of song learning. An alternative model based on memorization by selection postulates a system of innate neural templates that facilitate the recognition and rapid memorization of conspecific song patterns. Behavioral evidence compatible with this model includes learning preferences, rapid conspecific song learning, and widespread ocurrence of species-specific song universals that are recognized innately but fail to develop in songs of social isolates. A third model combines instruction, in the memorization phase, with selection during song production. An overproduced repertoire of plastic songs previously memorized by instruction is winnowed by selection imposed during social interactions at the time of adult song crystallization. Selection during production is well established as a factor in the song development of several species, in the form of action-based learning. The possible role of selective processes in song memorization merits further neurobiological investigation.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9369456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurobiol        ISSN: 0022-3034


  65 in total

1.  Gradual emergence of song selectivity in sensorimotor structures of the male zebra finch song system.

Authors:  P Janata; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Transferring an inborn auditory perceptual predisposition with interspecies brain transplants.

Authors:  K D Long; G Kennedy; E Balaban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Development of topography within song control circuitry of zebra finches during the sensitive period for song learning.

Authors:  S Iyengar; S S Viswanathan; S W Bottjer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Learning and memory.

Authors:  H Okano; T Hirano; E Balaban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A preference for own-subspecies' song guides vocal learning in a song bird.

Authors:  D A Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Bird song, ecology and speciation.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Thomas B Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  A framework for integrating the songbird brain.

Authors:  E D Jarvis; V A Smith; K Wada; M V Rivas; M McElroy; T V Smulders; P Carninci; Y Hayashizaki; F Dietrich; X Wu; P McConnell; J Yu; P P Wang; A J Hartemink; S Lin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Neural response to bird's own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium.

Authors:  N Amin; J A Grace; F E Theunissen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly.

Authors:  Erica L Westerman; Andrea Hodgins-Davis; April Dinwiddie; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.