Literature DB >> 9367772

De novo protein design: towards fully automated sequence selection.

B I Dahiyat1, C A Sarisky, S L Mayo.   

Abstract

Several groups have applied and experimentally tested systematic, quantitative methods to protein design with the goal of developing general design algorithms. We have sought to expand the range of computational protein design by developing quantitative design methods for residues of all parts of a protein: the buried core, the solvent exposed surface, and the boundary between core and surface. Our goal is an objective, quantitative design algorithm that is based on the physical properties that determine protein structure and stability and which is not limited to specific folds or motifs. We chose the betabetaalpha motif typified by the zinc finger DNA binding module to test our design methodology. Using previously published sequence scoring functions developed with a combined experimental and computational approach and the Dead-End Elimination theorem to search for the optimal sequence, we designed 20 out of 28 positions in the test motif. The resulting sequence has less than 40% homology to any known sequence and does not contain any metal binding sites or cysteine residues. The resulting peptide, pda8d, is highly soluble and monomeric and circular dichroism measurements showed it to be folded with a weakly cooperative thermal unfolding transition. The NMR solution structure of pda8d was solved and shows that it is well-defined with a backbone ensemble rms deviation of 0. 55 A. Pda8d folds into the desired betabetaalpha motif with well-defined elements of secondary structure and tertiary organization. Superposition of the pda8d backbone to the design target is excellent, with an atomic rms deviation of 1.04 A. Copyright 1997 Academic Press Limited

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9367772     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  37 in total

1.  Tanford-Kirkwood electrostatics for protein modeling.

Authors:  J J Havranek; P B Harbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  De novo design of helical bundles as models for understanding protein folding and function.

Authors:  R B Hill; D P Raleigh; A Lombardi; W F DeGrado
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Structure of a protein G helix variant suggests the importance of helix propensity and helix dipole interactions in protein design.

Authors:  P Strop; A M Marinescu; S L Mayo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure.

Authors:  K Raha; A M Wollacott; M J Italia; J R Desjarlais
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Enzyme-like proteins by computational design.

Authors:  D N Bolon; S L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Increasing protein stability using a rational approach combining sequence homology and structural alignment: Stabilizing the WW domain.

Authors:  X Jiang; J Kowalski; J W Kelly
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  On hydrophobicity and conformational specificity in proteins.

Authors:  Erik Sandelin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  In silico protein design by combinatorial assembly of protein building blocks.

Authors:  Hui-Hsu Gavin Tsai; Chung-Jung Tsai; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models.

Authors:  Alfonso Jaramillo; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Structural, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies of specificity designed HIV-1 protease.

Authors:  Oscar Alvizo; Seema Mittal; Stephen L Mayo; Celia A Schiffer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.