Literature DB >> 9366536

Changing to core biopsy in an NHS breast screening unit.

P D Britton1, C D Flower, A H Freeman, R Sinnatamby, R Warren, M J Goddard, D G Wight, L Bobrow.   

Abstract

We recently changed from using fine needle aspiration cytology to using core biopsy exclusively in the assessment of screen detected abnormalities. Two hundred and two biopsies (1% of women screened) were performed. Surgical histological confirmation was obtained in 111 patients (101 malignant and 10 benign). The remaining patients were either returned to standard 3-yearly screening or early repeat screening after 1 year. Analysis of the results was performed in accordance with the standards specified in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) Publication Number 22. Absolute sensitivity was 89.3%, complete sensitivity was 93.2%, specificity (including patients undergoing both surgical excision and follow-up) was 88.7%. The predictive value of a positive (malignant) core biopsy result was 100%. The false negative rate was 3.9%. Twelve (5.9%) biopsies were classified inadequate for diagnosis. Core biopsy is a safe and accurate way of assessing screen detected abnormalities and can be used as a substitute for fine needle aspiration cytology with results that exceed the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme target standards, even in the learning phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9366536     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80156-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  14 in total

1.  Waiting for a diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram. SMPBC diagnostic process workgroup. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; L Kan; S King
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Minimally Invasive Biopsy Methods - Diagnostics or Therapy? Personal Opinion and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparison of core oestrogen receptor (ER) assay with excised tumour: intratumoral distribution of ER in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A G Douglas-Jones; N Collett; J M Morgan; B Jasani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases.

Authors:  Mary F Dillon; Arnold D K Hill; Cecily M Quinn; Ann O'Doherty; Enda W McDermott; Niall O'Higgins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: is it justified by results?

Authors:  J Shannon; A G Douglas-Jones; N S Dallimore
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  The Evolving Role of Vacuum Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: A Progression from Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.

Authors:  Ian C Bennett; Apoorva Saboo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; C Bancej; V Goel; J Snider; R G McAuley; B Irvine; L Kan; D Mirsky; M J Sabine; R McGilly; J S Caines
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Mammographic density and inter-observer variability of pathologic evaluation of core biopsies among women with mammographic abnormalities.

Authors:  Pietro Trocchi; Giske Ursin; Oliver Kuss; Kathrin Ruschke; Andrea Schmidt-Pokrzywniak; Hans-Jürgen Holzhausen; Thomas Löning; Christoph Thomssen; Werner Böcker; Alexander Kluttig; Andreas Stang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).

Authors:  Alexander Kluttig; Pietro Trocchi; Anke Heinig; Hans-Juergen Holzhausen; Christiane Taege; Steffen Hauptmann; Werner Boecker; Thomas Decker; Thomas Loening; Andrea Schmidt-Pokrzywniak; Christoph Thomssen; Tilmann Lantzsch; Joerg Buchmann; Andreas Stang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.