Literature DB >> 9365766

Has the rate of progression to AIDS changed in recent years?

N Carré1, M Prins, L Meyer, R P Brettle, J R Robertson, H McArdle, D J Goldberg, R Zangerle, R A Coutinho, A van den Hoek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the rate of progression to AIDS has changed over time by testing an effect of the year of seroconversion on AIDS onset (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1987 revised classification), next to an effect of the calendar period of follow-up.
DESIGN: French multicentre prospective study of 385 homosexual and heterosexual subjects and 231 subjects from a multicentre study of European injecting drug users (IDU), all with a documented date of HIV-1 seroconversion.
METHOD: The effect of the year of seroconversion was compared by the log-rank test. Crude and adjusted relative hazard (ARH) were quantified using the Cox model. Calendar period of follow-up was studied separately for sexual exposure group and IDU and treated as a time-dependent variable in a Cox model.
RESULTS: In the 616 study subjects the year of seroconversion was not significantly related to AIDS occurrence (n = 108); the ARH was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-1.38] for those who seroconverted in 1988-1989, and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.61-2.25) for those who seroconverted after 1989, compared with those who seroconverted before 1988. In the sexual exposure group, a clear trend towards less rapid progression to AIDS was observed in subjects followed in 1991-1992 (ARH, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99) and after 1992 (ARH, 0.54; 95% CI; 0.24-1.21), compared with those followed before 1991. This favorable trend was not observed in IDU despite a significant decrease over time of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia as AIDS-defining illness. Conversely to sexual exposure groups, the frequency of antiretroviral treatment (mainly zidovudine) prescription was still low during the most recent calendar periods in IDU when the CD4 count threshold of 200 x 10(6)/l was reached.
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found of a change in the rate of progression to AIDS in subjects who seroconverted in recent years. Furthermore, conversely to sexual exposure groups, the lack of favorable trends in IDU users followed in recent years suggest that health-care systems are not always adapted to their lifestyles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9365766     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199713000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  4 in total

1.  Do HIV disease progression and HAART response vary among injecting drug users in Europe?

Authors:  Liselotte van Asten; Robert Zangerle; Ildefonso Hernández Aguado; Faroudy Boufassa; Barbara Broers; Raymond P Brettle; J Roy Robertson; Jim McMenamin; Roel A Coutinho; Maria Prins
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Is the virulence of HIV changing? A meta-analysis of trends in prognostic markers of HIV disease progression and transmission.

Authors:  Joshua T Herbeck; Viktor Müller; Brandon S Maust; Bruno Ledergerber; Carlo Torti; Simona Di Giambenedetto; Luuk Gras; Huldrych F Günthard; Lisa P Jacobson; James I Mullins; Geoffrey S Gottlieb
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  The contribution of viral genotype to plasma viral set-point in HIV infection.

Authors:  Emma Hodcroft; Jarrod D Hadfield; Esther Fearnhill; Andrew Phillips; David Dunn; Siobhan O'Shea; Deenan Pillay; Andrew J Leigh Brown
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 4.  The phylogenomics of evolving virus virulence.

Authors:  Jemma L Geoghegan; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 53.242

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.