Literature DB >> 9365349

Response of pain to static magnetic fields in postpolio patients: a double-blind pilot study.

C Vallbona1, C F Hazlewood, G Jurida.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the chronic pain frequently presented by postpolio patients can be relieved by application of magnetic fields applied directly over an identified pain trigger point.
DESIGN: Double-blind randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: The postpolio clinic of a large rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty patients with diagnosed postpolio syndrome who reported muscular or arthritic-like pain. INTERVENTION: Application of active or placebo 300 to 500 Gauss magnetic devices to the affected area for 45 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients who received the active device experienced an average pain score decrease of 4.4 +/- 3.1 (p < .0001) on a 10-point scale. Those with the placebo devices experienced a decrease of 1.1 +/- 1.6 points (p < .005). The proportion of patients in the active-device group who reported a pain score decrease greater than the average placebo effect was 76%, compared with 19% in the placebo-device group (p < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The application of a device delivering static magnetic fields of 300 to 500 Gauss over a pain trigger point results in significant and prompt relief of pain in postpolio subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9365349     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90332-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  7 in total

Review 1.  Static magnets for reducing pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Max H Pittler; Elizabeth M Brown; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  [Medical relevance of magnetic fields in pain therapy].

Authors:  G Salomonowitz; M Friedrich; B J Güntert
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Therapeutic Magnets Do Not Affect Tissue Temperatures.

Authors:  Kathleen B. Sweeney; Mark A. Merrick; Christopher D. Ingersoll; John A. Swez
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The influence of N and S poles of static magnetic field (SMF) on Candida albicans hyphal formation and antifungal activity of amphotericin B.

Authors:  Dariusz Sztafrowski; Jakub Suchodolski; Jakub Muraszko; Karel Sigler; Anna Krasowska
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Static magnetic field therapy: a critical review of treatment parameters.

Authors:  Agatha P Colbert; Helané Wahbeh; Noelle Harling; Erin Connelly; Heather C Schiffke; Cora Forsten; William L Gregory; Marko S Markov; James J Souder; Patricia Elmer; Valerie King
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Efficacy of static magnetic field for locomotor activity of experimental osteopenia.

Authors:  Norimasa Taniguchi; Shigeyuki Kanai
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  An Overview of Biofield Devices.

Authors:  David Muehsam; Gaétan Chevalier; Tiffany Barsotti; Blake T Gurfein
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2015-11-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.