Literature DB >> 21258821

[Medical relevance of magnetic fields in pain therapy].

G Salomonowitz1, M Friedrich, B J Güntert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic and electromagnetic fields have been accepted as real physical entities in medicine and are believed to achieve pain relief. Magnetic field therapy has been acknowledged as a non-invasive, safe and simple method for treatment of the site of injury, source of pain or inflammation, or other types of illnesses and pathologies. However, a consensus regarding the statistical relevance of the effects has not been established.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed literature research was performed and the results were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were that the studies had to be randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, and no additional forms of treatment other than magnetic effects were allowed to be used.
RESULTS: The evaluation of 17 studies with static magnetic fields showed on average no significant difference in pain relief between the group treated with magnetic fields and the placebo group. All studies using magnetic fields showed that forms of treatment conducted over a period of 30 min and at intervals of 1 week have no effects. In 10 studies with dynamic magnetic fields different effects were registered, which ranged from no effect to significant differences regarding pain relief between the treated and the control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Static magnetic fields are ineffective with respect to pain therapy. Dynamic magnetic fields show diverse effects. Hence, this therapy should be researched in depth. © Deutsche Gesellschaft zum Studium des Schmerzes

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21258821     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-010-1005-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  34 in total

1.  Possible mechanism for the influence of weak magnetic fields on biological systems.

Authors:  V V Lednev
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 2.  Repair of non-unions by pulsing electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  C A Bassett; S N Mitchell; L Norton; A Pilla
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.500

3.  Influence of static magnetic fields on pain perception and sympathetic nerve activity in humans.

Authors:  Nathan T Kuipers; Charity L Sauder; Chester A Ray
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-12-28

4.  Effect of magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on nonspecific foot pain in the workplace: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark H Winemiller; Robert G Billow; Edward R Laskowski; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Ice and pulsed electromagnetic field to reduce pain and swelling after distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Gladys L Y Cheing; Jolly W H Wan; Sing Kai Lo
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Bipolar permanent magnets for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  E A Collacott; J T Zimmerman; D W White; J P Rindone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The effectiveness of magnet therapy for treatment of wrist pain attributed to carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Richard Carter; Cheryl B Aspy; James Mold
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Response of pain to static magnetic fields in postpolio patients: a double-blind pilot study.

Authors:  C Vallbona; C F Hazlewood; G Jurida
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of static magnets for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Peter M Wolsko; David M Eisenberg; Lee S Simon; Roger B Davis; Jan Walleczek; Michael Mayo-Smith; Ted J Kaptchuk; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.305

10.  Human exposure to a specific pulsed magnetic field: effects on thermal sensory and pain thresholds.

Authors:  Naomi M Shupak; Frank S Prato; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziying Wu; Xiang Ding; Yilun Wang; Dongxing Xie; Guanghua Lei; Chao Zeng; Jie Wei; Jiatian Li; Hui Li; Tuo Yang; Yang Cui; Yilin Xiong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  3D digital analysis of magnetic force-driven orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Yukinori Kuwajima; Yoshiki Ishida; Cliff Lee; Hisayo Mayama; Kazuro Satoh; Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-11-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.