Literature DB >> 9361611

Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis.

F Lazorthes1, P Chiotasso, R A Gamagami, G Istvan, P Chevreau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional outcome after rectal excision with coloanal anastomosis is improved by construction of a colonic J pouch. Present prospective randomized studies lack follow-up beyond 1 year. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome at both short- and long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Forty patients with low rectal cancer were randomized prospectively to either J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis or a straight coloanal anastomosis. Clinical assessments were performed 3, 12 and 24 months after colostomy closure using a standard questionnaire and physical examination.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups. There was a significant (P < 0.01) improvement in frequency of defaecation at 3, 12 and 24 months for patients with a reservoir. Similarly, fragmentation (clustering of stools) was significantly less at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.01) in the reservoir group, and incontinence occurred less frequently in the first year (P = 0.09). By 24 months no patient in either group suffered from major or minor incontinence.
CONCLUSION: The functional improvement gained from a colonic reservoir in coloanal anastomosis continues to benefit the patient for at least 2 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9361611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  40 in total

1.  Detection of a rectocele-like prolapse in the colonic J-pouch using pouchography: cause or effect of evacuation difficulties?

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; T Maruyama; T Yoshifuji; T Tokoro; T Wakano; T Uchida; K Ueda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Steven Brown; Siu-Meng Heah; Charles Tsang; Francis Seow-Choen; Kong-Weng Eu; Choong Leong Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Reconstructive surgery after anterior resection of the rectum].

Authors:  S Willis; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

Review 5.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Long-term functional outcome of colonic J-pouch reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Ichi Hida; Takehito Yoshifuji; Kiyotaka Okuno; Tomohiko Matsuzaki; Toshihiro Uchida; Eizaburou Ishimaru; Tadao Tokoro; Masayuki Yasutomi; Hitoshi Shiozaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Massarat Zutshi; Feza H Remzi; Yann Parc; Reinhard Ruppert; Alois Fürst; James Celebrezze; Susan Galanduik; Guy Orangio; Neil Hyman; Leslie Bokey; Emmanuel Tiret; Boris Kirchdorfer; David Medich; Marcus Tietze; Tracy Hull; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  [The transverse coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection: early postoperative results].

Authors:  A Ulrich; K Z'graggen; B Schmied; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what's the best?

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.