Literature DB >> 9361601

Reduction of intraperitoneal adhesion formation by use of non-abrasive gauze.

M P van den Tol1, I van Stijn, F Bonthuis, R L Marquet, J Jeekel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation is potentially harmful. Surgical swabs may contribute to adhesions by trauma to the peritoneum. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether standard surgical gauze (Medipres) has an adhesion-promoting effect, and to determine whether a soft textile (Fastsorb), used in the electronics industry, might be less traumatic and therefore lead to less adhesion formation.
METHODS: A reproducible rat model allowing semiquantitative scoring of adhesion formation was used. Three different adhesion models representing increasing degrees of peritoneal trauma (minimal, moderate and severe) were employed. The model inflicting minimal peritoneal trauma was combined with standardized rubbing of the peritoneum with surgical gauze or non-surgical textile.
RESULTS: Minimal peritoneal trauma resulted in a significantly lower mean adhesion percentage (21 per cent) than moderate (44 per cent) or severe (60 per cent) peritoneal trauma (P < or = 0.005). Rubbing of the peritoneum with surgical gauze after minimal peritoneal trauma induced significantly more adhesion formation (58 versus 23 per cent, P < 0.0001). After minimal peritoneal trauma, rubbing with surgical gauze produced significantly more adhesions than rubbing with non-surgical textile (63 versus 19 per cent, P < 0.0001). Moreover, rubbing the peritoneum with non-surgical textile after minimal peritoneal trauma did not induce any additional adhesion formation (35 versus 24 per cent, P = 0.23).
CONCLUSION: The extent of adhesion formation correlates significantly with the degree of peritoneal damage. Standard surgical gauze is traumatizing to the peritoneum and promotes adhesion formation whereas a less abrasive non-surgical textile does not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9361601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

1.  Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; F Bonthuis; E W Steyerberg; R L Marquet; J Jeekel; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Lap pak for abdominal retraction.

Authors:  Ganesh Sivarajan; Sam S Chang; Amr Fergany; S Bruce Malkowicz; Gary D Steinberg; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

3.  Reduction of peritoneal trauma by using nonsurgical gauze leads to less implantation metastasis of spilled tumor cells.

Authors:  P M van den Tol; E E van Rossen; C H van Eijck; F Bonthuis; R L Marquet; H Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Experimental study evaluating the effect of a barrier method on postoperative intraabdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Axel Schneider; Joachim Bennek; Kasper Ø Olsen; Joachim Weiss; Wolfgang Schmidt; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Optimal sutures for use in the abdomen: an evaluation based on the formation of adhesions and abscesses.

Authors:  Kenji Ishikawa; Sotaro Sadahiro; Yoichi Tanaka; Toshiyuki Suzuki; Akemi Kamijo; Seiki Tazume
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Comparison of peritoneal adhesion formation in bowel retraction by cotton towels versus the silicone lap pak device in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Brian G Liu; Dawn S Ruben; Wolfgang Renz; Antonio Santillan; Steven J Kubisen; John W Harmon
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-11-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.