Literature DB >> 9360758

Correlations between skin prick tests using commercial extracts and fresh foods, specific IgE, and food challenges.

F Rancé1, A Juchet, F Brémont, G Dutau.   

Abstract

The skin prick test is the most widely used test for detecting IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity. Our study aimed to define firstly the correlations between results obtained with prick tests using commercial extracts and fresh foods, and secondly the correlations between these results and those obtained with labial and/or oral challenge. We compared the wheal diameters read at 15 min with commercial extracts and fresh foods, for four foods, in 430 children with suspected food allergy. For cow's milk, wheal diameters were larger with commercial extracts, but the difference was not significant. Conversely, wheal diameters were significantly larger with fresh foods for the other food allergens. Skin prick tests were positive in 40% of cases with commercial extracts and in 81.3% with fresh foods. The overall concordance between a positive prick test and positive challenge was 58.8% with commercial extracts and 91.7% with fresh foods. These results indicate that fresh foods may be more effective for detecting the sensitivity to food allergens. Fresh foods should be used for primary testing for egg, peanut, and cow's milk sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9360758     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  19 in total

Review 1.  Update on food allergy in adults.

Authors:  Rabia Quddus Chaudhry; John J Oppenheimer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Diagnosis of food allergy: epicutaneous skin tests, in vitro tests, and oral food challenge.

Authors:  Jay A Lieberman; Scott H Sicherer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Agreement of specific IgE and skin prick test in an unselected cohort of two-year-old children.

Authors:  Anne D Rø; Marit Saunes; Ingeborg Smidesang; Ola Storrø; Torbjørn Oien; Torolf Moen; Roar Johnsen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Optimizing the diagnosis of food allergy.

Authors:  Jacob D Kattan; Scott H Sicherer
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  HRQoL questionnaire evaluation in lactose intolerant patients with adverse reactions to foods.

Authors:  Ridolo Erminia; Baiardini Ilaria; Meschi Tiziana; Peveri Silvia; Nouvenne Antonio; Dall'Aglio Pierpaolo; Borghi Loris
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Perfluoroalkyl substances and food allergies in adolescents.

Authors:  Melanie C Buser; Franco Scinicariello
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Should Younger Siblings of Peanut-Allergic Children Be Assessed by an Allergist before Being Fed Peanut?

Authors:  Joel J Liem; Saiful Huq; Anita L Kozyrskyj; Allan B Becker
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 8.  Allergens in atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Y-S Dai
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 9.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cow's milk protein allergy in infants.

Authors:  Yvan Vandenplas; Sibylle Koletzko; Erika Isolauri; David Hill; Arnold P Oranje; Martin Brueton; Annamaria Staiano; Christophe Dupont
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 10.  Peanut allergy: an overview.

Authors:  Saleh Al-Muhsen; Ann E Clarke; Rhoda S Kagan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.