Literature DB >> 9360485

Perceiving the causes of coarticulatory acoustic variation: consonant voicing and vowel pitch.

J S Pardo1, C A Fowler.   

Abstract

Coarticulatory acoustic variation is presumed to be caused by temporally overlapping linguistically significant gestures of the vocal tract. The complex acoustic consequences of such gestures can be hypothesized to specify them without recourse to context-sensitive representations of phonetic segments. When the consequences of separate gestures converge on a common acoustic dimension (e.g., fundamental frequency), perceptual parsing of the acoustic consequences of overlapping spoken gestures, rather than associations of acoustic features, is required to resolve the distinct gestural events. Direct tests of this theory were conducted. These tests revealed mutual influences of (1) fundamental frequency during a vowel on prior consonant perception, and (2) consonant identity on following vowel stress and pitch perception. The results of these converging tests lead to the conclusion that speech perception involves a process in which acoustic information for coarticulated gestures is parsed from the stream of speech.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9360485     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  5 in total

1.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Putting phonetic context effects into context: a commentary on Fowler (2006).

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

3.  Voice Onset Time and beyond: Exploring laryngeal contrast in 19 languages.

Authors:  Taehong Cho; D H Whalen; Gerard Docherty
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-12-11

4.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Listeners' perception of compensatory shortening.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler; Jaqueline M Thompson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.