OBJECTIVE: Respiratory abnormalities may play a central role in the pathophysiology of panic disorder. The current study was undertaken to examine the respiratory response in the largest series of subjects to date during three respiratory challenges that used improved methodology. METHOD: Fifty-nine patients with DSM-III-R panic disorder and 39 normal volunteers were challenged with 5% and 7% CO2 inhalation and room air hyperventilation separated by room air breathing with continuous spirometry. RESULTS: Patients with panic disorder were more sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of CO2 than were normal subjects, and CO2 was a more potent stimulus to panic than hyperventilation. Patients increased their respiratory rate more quickly during CO2 inhalation than did comparison subjects, and this increase preceded the panic attacks. Patients who panicked in response to 5% CO2 demonstrated continued rise in end-tidal CO2, while the end-tidal CO2 of the comparison groups stabilized. Low end-tidal CO2 and high variance in minute ventilation at baseline predicted panic attacks during CO2 inhalation. Following CO2 or hyperventilation challenges, respiratory rate dropped sharply, while tidal volume remained elevated longer in patients than in comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm the greater behavioral and physiological sensitivity of patients with panic disorder to CO2 inhalation and identify a series of respiratory abnormalities. Panic attacks in panic disorder may be explained by inefficient compensatory mechanisms, primarily of respiratory rate.
OBJECTIVE:Respiratory abnormalities may play a central role in the pathophysiology of panic disorder. The current study was undertaken to examine the respiratory response in the largest series of subjects to date during three respiratory challenges that used improved methodology. METHOD: Fifty-nine patients with DSM-III-R panic disorder and 39 normal volunteers were challenged with 5% and 7% CO2 inhalation and room air hyperventilation separated by room air breathing with continuous spirometry. RESULTS:Patients with panic disorder were more sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of CO2 than were normal subjects, and CO2 was a more potent stimulus to panic than hyperventilation. Patients increased their respiratory rate more quickly during CO2 inhalation than did comparison subjects, and this increase preceded the panic attacks. Patients who panicked in response to 5% CO2 demonstrated continued rise in end-tidal CO2, while the end-tidal CO2 of the comparison groups stabilized. Low end-tidal CO2 and high variance in minute ventilation at baseline predicted panic attacks during CO2 inhalation. Following CO2 or hyperventilation challenges, respiratory rate dropped sharply, while tidal volume remained elevated longer in patients than in comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm the greater behavioral and physiological sensitivity of patients with panic disorder to CO2 inhalation and identify a series of respiratory abnormalities. Panic attacks in panic disorder may be explained by inefficient compensatory mechanisms, primarily of respiratory rate.
Authors: Roxann Roberson-Nay; Donald F Klein; Rachel G Klein; Salvatore Mannuzza; John L Moulton; Mary Guardino; Daniel S Pine Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-02-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Anne H Borkowski; Dylan C Barnes; Derek R Blanchette; F Xavier Castellanos; Donald F Klein; Donald A Wilson Journal: Brain Res Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Borwin Bandelow; David Baldwin; Marianna Abelli; Blanca Bolea-Alamanac; Michel Bourin; Samuel R Chamberlain; Eduardo Cinosi; Simon Davies; Katharina Domschke; Naomi Fineberg; Edna Grünblatt; Marek Jarema; Yong-Ku Kim; Eduard Maron; Vasileios Masdrakis; Olya Mikova; David Nutt; Stefano Pallanti; Stefano Pini; Andreas Ströhle; Florence Thibaut; Matilde M Vaghi; Eunsoo Won; Dirk Wedekind; Adam Wichniak; Jade Woolley; Peter Zwanzger; Peter Riederer Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Amanda I Gillespie; William Slivka; Charles W Atwood; Katherine Verdolini Abbott Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Indu Ayappa; Robert G Norman; David Whiting; Albert H W Tsai; Fiona Anderson; Emma Donnely; David J Silberstein; David M Rapoport Journal: Sleep Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Karleyton C Evans; Darin D Dougherty; Annette M Schmid; Elizabeth Scannell; Adrienne McCallister; Herbert Benson; Jeffery A Dusek; Sara W Lazar Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 6.556