Literature DB >> 9355902

Assessment of atrioventricular junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled study.

M Brignole1, L Gianfranchi, C Menozzi, P Alboni, G Musso, M G Bongiorni, M Gasparini, A Raviele, G Lolli, N Paparella, S Acquarone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of AV junction ablation and pacemaker implantation on quality of life and specific symptoms in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) not controlled by drugs. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We performed a multicenter, randomized, 6-month evaluation of the clinical effects of AV junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker (Abl+Pm) versus pharmacological treatment in 43 patients with intolerable, recurrent paroxysmal AF of three or more episodes in the previous 6 months not controlled with three or more antiarrhythmic drugs. Before completion of the study, 3 patients in the drug group withdrew because of the severity of their symptoms and 1 patient assigned to the Abl+Pm group in whom the ablation procedure failed. At the end of the 6 months, the 21 patients of the Abl+Pm group who completed the study showed, in comparison with the 18 of the drug group, lower scores in the Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (-51%, P=.0006), palpitations (-71%, P=.0000), effort dyspnea (-36%, P=.04), exercise intolerance score (-46%, P=.001), and easy fatigue (-51%, P=.02). The scores for rest dyspnea, chest discomfort, and NYHA functional classification were also lower (-56%, -50%, and -17%, respectively) in the Abl+Pm group, although not significantly. At the end of the study, palpitations were no longer present in 81% of the Abl+Pm group and in 11% of the drug group (P=.0000). AF was documented in 31 of 122 visits (25%) in the Abl+Pm group and in 9 of 107 examinations (8%) in the drug group (P=.0005); chronic AF developed in 5 (24%) and 0 (0%) in the two groups, respectively (P=.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal AF not controlled by pharmacological therapy, Abl+Pm treatment is highly effective and superior to drug therapy in controlling symptoms and improving quality of life. The discontinuation of drug therapy exposes patients to further recurrences of paroxysmal AF and the risk of developing permanent AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9355902     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.96.8.2617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  39 in total

Review 1.  The ablate-and-pace strategy in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  P O'Callaghan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Surgery for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J M McComb
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Trials of pacing to control ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Mark A Wood
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Symptoms and functional status of patients with atrial fibrillation: state of the art and future research opportunities.

Authors:  Michiel Rienstra; Steven A Lubitz; Saagar Mahida; Jared W Magnani; João D Fontes; Moritz F Sinner; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Patrick T Ellinor; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  The AFFIRM trial: main trial and substudies-what can We expect?

Authors:  D G Wyse
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  [Outcome parameters for AF trials--executive summary of an AFNET-EHRA consensus conference].

Authors:  P Kirchhof; A Goette; G Hindricks; S Hohnloser; K-H Kuck; T Meinertz; U Ravens; G Steinbeck; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-12

7.  [The role of cardiac pacing in atrial arrhythmia prevention].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005

Review 8.  Atrial fibrillation: how to approach rate control.

Authors:  Lynda E Rosenfeld
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Atrioventricular Nodal Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Congestive Heart Failure.

Authors:  Osmar Antonio Centurión; Karina Elizabeth Scavenius; Laura B García; Luis Miño; Judith Torales; Orlando Sequeira
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-06-30

10.  Predictors of stroke risk in native Chinese with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: retrospective investigation of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Yihong Sun; Dayi Hu; Kuibao Li; Ziqiang Zhou
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.