Literature DB >> 10590505

The AFFIRM trial: main trial and substudies-what can We expect?

D G Wyse1.   

Abstract

The clinical categorization of patients who present with atrial fibrillation is a major determinant of the most appropriate strategy for rhythm management. For those patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation that has not become permanent the two available strategies are rhythm control and anticoagulation or rate control and anticoagulation. There is no clear evidence that one of these strategies is superior to the other. In the AFFIRM trial these two strategies are being compared to one another in a randomized trial. Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two strategies and the treating physician then uses therapies from an approved menu as clinically indicated. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies are used. An overview of the main study protocol is presented. The primary endpoint is total mortality but there are a number of clinically important secondary endpoints. Several substudies will explore important ancillary questions and some of these are also described. At this time over 3000 patients have been enrolled and the planned enrollment is 4300. Enrollment will end late in 1999 and the last patient enrolled will be followed for two years. The AFFIRM Trial will provide important information concerning the management of atrial fibrillation in a large portion of the patients who have this arrhythmia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10590505     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009815606734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of AV nodal ablation versus AV nodal modification in patients with congestive heart failure and uncontrolled atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  N Twidale; T McDonald; K Nave; A Seal
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Left ventricular dysfunction due to atrial fibrillation in patients initially believed to have idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  M Grogan; H C Smith; B J Gersh; D L Wood
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  A prospective hemodynamic evaluation of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction.

Authors:  P Geelen; M Goethals; B de Bruyne; P Brugada
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Comparisons of quality of life and cardiac performance after complete atrioventricular junction ablation and atrioventricular junction modification in patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S H Lee; S A Chen; C T Tai; C E Chiang; Z C Wen; J J Cheng; Y A Ding; M S Chang
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The cost-effectiveness of automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators: results from MADIT. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; W J Hall; J Zwanziger; E Gajary; M Andrews; R Marron; K H Zou; A J Moss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-06-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Serial antiarrhythmic drug treatment to maintain sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

Authors:  H J Crijns; I C Van Gelder; W H Van Gilst; H Hillege; A M Gosselink; K I Lie
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  The Ablate and Pace Trial: a prospective study of catheter ablation of the AV conduction system and permanent pacemaker implantation for treatment of atrial fibrillation. APT Investigators.

Authors:  G N Kay; K A Ellenbogen; M Giudici; M M Redfield; L S Jenkins; M Mianulli; B Wilkoff
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

Authors:  D S Echt; P R Liebson; L B Mitchell; R W Peters; D Obias-Manno; A H Barker; D Arensberg; A Baker; L Friedman; H L Greene
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and cardiac mortality in atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

Authors:  G C Flaker; J L Blackshear; R McBride; R A Kronmal; J L Halperin; R G Hart
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Prevention of embolic events after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Current and evolving strategies.

Authors:  J W Kinch; R Davidoff
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-07-10
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Randomized trials of rate vs. rhythm control for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Mina K Chung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  New insights into the mechanisms and management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Paul Khairy; Stanley Nattel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Current management of symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  K S Channer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.