Literature DB >> 9355885

Simplified electrophysiologically directed catheter ablation of recurrent common atrial flutter.

D C Shah1, M Haïssaguerre, P Jaïs, B Fischer, A Takahashi, M Hocini, J Clementy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite verification of bidirectional conduction block after radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in the inferior vena cava (IVC)-tricuspid annulus (TA) isthmus, recurrence of common atrial flutter is relatively common. Although complete linear reablation is usually performed, we evaluated a simplified electrophysiological strategy selectively targeting recovered conducting isthmus tissue. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (18 men and 3 women, age, 54+/-10 years) with a recurrence of typical atrial flutter 6+/-7 months after an apparently successful catheter ablation in the IVC-TA isthmus prospectively underwent electrophysiologically targeted reablation during flutter. Sites with narrow electrograms or fractionated electrograms interposed between adjacent sites with double potentials considered to represent gaps were ablated without movement of the catheter. Mapping showed that 18 of 21 patients had a single gap. Successful ablation required a single application in 14 patients and, in the group as a whole, a median of one application (mean, 2+/-2; range, 1 to 11) with resultant bidirectional block in 13 of 16. A single narrow electrogram (duration, 48+/-6 ms; amplitude, 0.1+/-0.05 mV) was noted at the successful site in 11, whereas a fractionated electrogram (97+/-32 ms, 0.05+/-0.04 mV, P<.05) was noted in 9. There were four additional recurrences during a follow-up at 7+/-5 months; three were similarly ablated with a median of one pulse.
CONCLUSIONS: Transmural ablation lesions in the isthmus can be recognized during flutter by double potentials separated by an isoelectric interval. Postablation recurrent flutter is usually due to a single discrete recovered gap; this is represented by a single or a fractionated potential spanning the isoelectric interval of adjacent double potentials, which can be selectively targeted to minimize repeat ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9355885     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.96.8.2505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  17 in total

1.  Electroanatomic magnetic mapping during ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

Authors:  R F Coyne; M Deely; C D Gottlieb; F E Marchlinski; D J Callans
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Atrial Flutter.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  1999-08

3.  A model for in vivo validation of linear lesions in the right atrium.

Authors:  Sabine Ernst; Feifan Ouyang; Christian Clausen; Masahiko Goya; Siew Yen Ho; Matthias Antz; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Double potential interval and transisthmus conduction time for prediction of cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Ching-Tai Tai; Azizul Haque; Yung-Kuo Lin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Yu-An Ding; Mau-Song Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Differential pacing for distinguishing slow conduction from complete conduction block of the tricuspid-inferior vena cava isthmus after radiofrequency ablation for atrial flutter--role of transverse conduction through the crista terminalis.

Authors:  Hidezou Sugimura; Ichiro Watanabe; Yasuo Okumura; Kimie Ohkubo; Sonoko Ashino; Toshiko Nakai; Yuji Kasamaki; Satoshi Saito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  A new and simple method for distinguishing complete from incomplete block through the cavotricuspid isthmus.

Authors:  Gabriel Laurent; Alexandra Bourcier; Géraldine Bertaux; Stéphane Fromentin; Michel Fraison; Stéphanie Gonzalez; François Saint Pierre; Jean Eric Wolf
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Predictors of acute inefficacy and the radiofrequency energy time required for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Jordi Pérez-Rodon; Julian Rodriguez-García; Axel Sarrias-Merce; Nuria Rivas-Gandara; Ivo Roca-Luque; Jaume Francisco-Pascual; Alba Santos-Ortega; Gabriel Martín-Sánchez; Ignacio Ferreira-González; Jose Rodríguez-Palomares; Artur Evangelista-Masip; David García-Dorado; Àngel Moya-Mitjans
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Electrophysiology of a gap created on the canine atrium.

Authors:  Kei Yano; Kenzo Hirao; Tomoe Horikawa; Michio Tanaka; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Assessment of the maximum voltage-guided technique for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation during ongoing atrial flutter.

Authors:  T Bauernfeind; A Kardos; C Foldesi; A Mihalcz; P Abraham; T Szili-Torok
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Typical Atrial Flutter - When Do You Say You Have Got It.

Authors:  Michaël Peyrol; Pascal Sbragia
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.