Literature DB >> 9354037

Pain and the choice to hasten death in patients with painful metastatic cancer.

M Sullivan1, S Rapp, D Fitzgibbon, C R Chapman.   

Abstract

Unrelieved pain has been cited as an important reason why cancer patients may seek to hasten their deaths. We interviewed 48 patients with painful metastatic cancer to ascertain their interest in various active and passive modes of hastening death. Ninety percent of these patients supported the general right of terminally ill patients to passive modes of hastening death and 80% supported the right to active modes such as assisted suicide and euthanasia. If they developed severe pain that could not be relieved, 80% would instruct their physician write a "do not attempt resuscitation" order, 40%-50% would want to receive suicide information or a lethal prescription from their physician, and 34% would request a lethal injection from their physician. Current pain and depression levels were not associated with interest in hastening death, but current somatic symptom burden was significantly associated with this interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; University of Washington Medical Center

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9354037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Care        ISSN: 0825-8597            Impact factor:   2.250


  8 in total

Review 1.  Patients' voices are needed in debates on euthanasia.

Authors:  Yvonne Y W Mak; Glyn Elwyn; Ilora G Finlay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-26

2.  Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyung Hee Han; Sohee Park; Byeong Woo Park; Chi-Heum Cho; Sung Kim; Dae Ho Lee; Soon Nam Lee; Eun Sook Lee; Jung Hun Kang; Si-Young Kim; Jung Lim Lee; Dae Seog Heo; Chang Geol Lee; Yeun Keun Lim; Sam Yong Kim; Jong Soo Choi; Hyun Sik Jeong; Mison Chun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  [Limits of pain treatment: medical and judicial aspects].

Authors:  M Zenz; R Rissing-van Saan
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Assessment of consent capability in psychiatric and medical studies.

Authors:  Raymond C Tait; John T Chibnall; Ana Iltis; Anji Wall; Teresa L Deshields
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 5.  The undertreatment of pain: scientific, clinical, cultural, and philosophical factors.

Authors:  D B Resnik; M Rehm; R B Minard
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

6.  IRB Member Judgments of Decisional Capacity, Coercion, and Risk in Medical and Psychiatric Studies.

Authors:  Rebecca Luebbert; Raymond C Tait; John T Chibnall; Teresa L Deshields
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Jin-Ah Sim; Shin Hye Yoo; Miso Kim; Young Ae Kim; Beo Deul Kang; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Eun-Kee Song; Jung Hun Kang; Jung Hye Kwon; Jung Lim Lee; Eun Mi Nam; Chi Hoon Maeng; Eun Joo Kang; Young Rok Do; Yoon Seok Choi; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  A cross-sectional study on associations of physical symptoms, health self-efficacy, and suicidal ideation among Chinese hospitalized cancer patients.

Authors:  Qingyi Xu; Shuhua Jia; Maiko Fukasawa; Lin Lin; Jun Na; Zhen Mu; Bo Li; Ningning Li; Tong Zhao; Zaishuang Ju; Meng He; Lianzheng Yu; Norito Kawakami; Yuejin Li; Chao Jiang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.630

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.