Literature DB >> 9353984

Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary.

H Jain1, D Isaacson, P M Edic, J C Newell.   

Abstract

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) uses low-frequency current and voltage measurements made on the boundary of a body to compute the conductivity distribution within the body. Since the permittivity distribution inside the body also contributes significantly to the measured voltages, the present reconstruction algorithm images complex conductivity distributions. A finite element model (FEM) is used to solve the forward problem, using a 6017-node mesh for a piecewise-linear potential distribution. The finite element solution using this mesh is compared with the analytical solution for a homogeneous field and a maximum error of 0.05% is observed in the voltage distribution. The boundary element method (BEM) is also used to generate the voltage data for inhomogeneous conductivity distributions inside regions with noncircular boundaries. An iterative reconstruction algorithm is described for approximating both the conductivity and permittivity distributions from this data. The results for an off-centered inhomogeneity showed a 35% improvement in contrast from that seen with only one iteration, for both the conductivity and the permittivity values. It is also shown that a significant improvement in images results from accurately modeling a noncircular boundary. Both static and difference images are distorted by assuming a circular boundary and the amount of distortion increases significantly as the boundary shape becomes more elliptical. For a homogeneous field in an elliptical body with axis ratio of 0.73, an image reconstructed assuming the boundary to be circular has an artifact at the center of the image with an error of 20%. This error increased to 37% when the axis ratio was 0.64. A reconstruction algorithm which used a mesh with the same axis ratio as the elliptical boundary reduced the error in the conductivity values to within 0.5% of the actual values.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353984     DOI: 10.1109/10.641332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  9 in total

1.  Reconstructions of conductive and insulating targets using the D-bar method on an elliptical domain.

Authors:  E K Murphy; J L Mueller; J C Newell
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Calderón's method on an elliptical domain.

Authors:  P A Muller; D Isaacson; J C Newell; G J Saulnier
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Optical breast shape capture and finite-element mesh generation for electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  J Forsyth; A Borsic; R J Halter; A Hartov; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.

Authors:  Myoung Hwan Choi; Tzu-Jen Kao; David Isaacson; Gary J Saulnier; Jonathan C Newell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Graph Convolutional Networks for Model-Based Learning in Nonlinear Inverse Problems.

Authors:  William Herzberg; Daniel B Rowe; Andreas Hauptmann; Sarah J Hamilton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Comput Imaging       Date:  2021-12-02

Review 6.  EEG source imaging in epilepsy--practicalities and pitfalls.

Authors:  Kitti Kaiboriboon; Hans O Lüders; Mehdi Hamaneh; John Turnbull; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  A direct D-bar reconstruction algorithm for recovering a complex conductivity in 2-D.

Authors:  S J Hamilton; C N L Herrera; J L Mueller; A Von Herrmann
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.407

8.  Measurement-Based Domain Parameter Optimization in Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging.

Authors:  Jan Dusek; Jan Mikulka
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Low Cost, High Performance, 16-Channel Microwave Measurement System for Tomographic Applications.

Authors:  Paul Meaney; Alexander Hartov; Timothy Raynolds; Cynthia Davis; Sebastian Richter; Florian Schoenberger; Shireen Geimer; Keith Paulsen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.