Literature DB >> 9353678

Socioeconomic status and cancer screening.

N Segnan1.   

Abstract

The only widely applied cancer screening programmes are those for cancers of the cervix and female breast. Participation in breast cancer screening has been shown to depend on income and education, health insurance and type of health service. Women in low social classes tend to have lower screening participation rates than those in higher classes. Socioeconomic differences in screening practices tend to decrease when participation is promoted, cultural and economic barriers are removed, and social support is offered. In both developed and developing countries, women of low socioeconomic status have a higher than average risk of cervical cancer, and a lower than average participation in Pap smear screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IARC Sci Publ        ISSN: 0300-5038


  14 in total

1.  Equity in prevention and health care.

Authors:  V Lorant; B Boland; P Humblet; D Deliège
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  A study of trends in beliefs and attitudes toward cancer.

Authors:  Eva Schernhammer; Gerald Haidinger; Thomas Waldhör; Roberto Vargas; Christian Vutuc
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Cervical pap screening cytological abnormalities among HIV-infected adolescents in the LEGACY cohort.

Authors:  Rosanna Setse; George K Siberry; William J Moss; Patti Gravitt; Travis Wheeling; Beverly Bohannon; Kenneth Dominguez
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in urine specimens from human immunodeficiency virus-positive women.

Authors:  Joeli A Brinkman; W Elizabeth Jones; Ann M Gaffga; Jonathan A Sanders; Anil K Chaturvedi; Joseph Slavinsky III; John L Clayton; Jeanne Dumestre; Michael E Hagensee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Financial strain and cancer risk behaviors among African Americans.

Authors:  Pragati S Advani; Lorraine R Reitzel; Nga T Nguyen; Felicia D Fisher; Elaine J Savoy; Adolfo G Cuevas; David W Wetter; Lorna H McNeill
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Performance of papanicolaou testing and detection of cervical carcinoma in situ in participants of organized cervical cancer screening in South Korea.

Authors:  Mi Ah Han; Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Kyu Won Jung; Sokbom Kang; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Social inequalities in breast cancer mortality among French women: disappearing educational disparities from 1968 to 1996.

Authors:  G Menvielle; A Leclerc; J-F Chastang; D Luce
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Income Related Inequality of Health Care Access in Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Misuzu Fujita; Yasunori Sato; Kengo Nagashima; Sho Takahashi; Akira Hata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  External Beam Therapy in a Four-Field Box Technique with Paclitaxel versus a Two-Field Technique with Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix: A Phase II Monocentric Trial.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Narayanan; Bibek Bista; Samir Sharma
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-12-31

10.  New algorithm for constructing area-based index with geographical heterogeneities and variable selection: An application to gastric cancer screening.

Authors:  Daisuke Yoneoka; Eiko Saito; Shinji Nakaoka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.