Literature DB >> 9353665

Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidence.

M Kogevinas1, M Porta.   

Abstract

In the discussion of social inequalities in health there has been much debate on the role of medical care. Large differences in cancer incidence and mortality from cancer have been consistently observed. To understand the potential importance of socioeconomic differences in prompt detection and treatment of cancer it is essential to have data on cancer survival. These have been examined less extensively than differences in cancer incidence. We have reviewed 42 studies on social class differences in cancer survival. Twenty-three studies were conducted in North America, and 15 in western European countries. Twenty-three studies were carried out through population-based cancer registries and 17 through hospitals or hospital-based registries. Seven studies examined survival differences for multiple cancer sites. Social class differences in cancer survival appear remarkably general. Patients in low social classes had consistently poorer survival than those in high social classes. The magnitude of the differences for most cancer sites was fairly narrow, with most relative risks falling between 1 and 1.5. The widest differences were observed for cancers of good prognosis and specifically cancers of the female breast, corpus uteri, bladder and colon. The pattern of the social differences in survival did not vary consistently by sex, country, or source of the study population and did not depend on the socioeconomic indicator used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IARC Sci Publ        ISSN: 0300-5038


  57 in total

1.  Decreasing environmental tobacco smoke exposure among low income children: preliminary findings.

Authors:  M F Hovell; J M Zakarian; G E Matt; C R Hofstetter; J T Bernert; J Pirkle
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Comparison of anal cancer outcomes in public and private hospital patients treated at a single radiation oncology center.

Authors:  Danielle S Bitterman; David Grew; Ping Gu; Richard F Cohen; Nicholas J Sanfilippo; Cynthia G Leichman; Lawrence P Leichman; Harvey G Moore; Heather T Gold; Kevin L Du
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10

3.  Geographic variation in colorectal cancer survival and the role of small-area socioeconomic deprivation: a multilevel survival analysis of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort.

Authors:  Min Lian; Mario Schootman; Chyke A Doubeni; Yikyung Park; Jacqueline M Major; Rosalie A Torres Stone; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Albert R Hollenbeck; Barry I Graubard; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England after the NHS cancer plan.

Authors:  B Rachet; L Ellis; C Maringe; T Chu; U Nur; M Quaresma; A Shah; S Walters; L Woods; D Forman; M P Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Socio-economic deprivation and outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for clinically localized upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R Mehta; A S Gillan; Z Y Ming; B P Rai; D Byrne; G Nabi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Cancer incidence in a cohort of Swedish chimney sweeps, 1958-2006.

Authors:  Christer Hogstedt; Catarina Jansson; Marcus Hugosson; Håkan Tinnerberg; Per Gustavsson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Cancer incidence, mortality from cancer and survival in men of different occupational classes.

Authors:  Annika Rosengren; Lars Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Provider and patient influences on the formation of socioeconomic health behavior disparities among pregnant women.

Authors:  Elaine M Hernandez
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  What underlies the high alcohol related mortality of the disadvantaged: high morbidity or poor survival?

Authors:  P Mäkelä; I Keskimäki; S Koskinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  p53 mutation, deprivation and poor prognosis in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  L Baker; P R Quinlan; N Patten; A Ashfield; L-J Birse-Stewart-Bell; C McCowan; J-C Bourdon; C A Purdie; L B Jordan; J A Dewar; L Wu; A M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.