Literature DB >> 9352990

Effect of biphasic waveforms on transvenous defibrillation thresholds in patients with coronary artery disease.

M R Olsovsky1, D M Hodgson, S R Shorofsky, N G Kavesh, M R Gold.   

Abstract

This study is a prospective, randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillation thresholds in 19 patients with a single transvenous lead. Despite using reverse polarity and optimal tilts for the monophasic waveform, the defibrillation threshold was reduced with biphasic shocks from 15.8 +/- 11.3 to 11.5 +/- 6.1 (p <0.05) with comparable reductions of leading edge voltage and current.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9352990     DOI： 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00615-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN： 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.

Authors:  James D Allred; Cheryl R Killingsworth; J Scott Allison; Derek J Dosdall; Sharon B Melnick; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker; Gregory P Walcott
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  A multicenter prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of escalating higher biphasic versus low biphasic energy defibrillations in patients presenting with cardiac arrest in the in-hospital environment.

Authors:  Venkataraman Anantharaman; Seow Yian Tay; Peter George Manning; Swee Han Lim; Terrance Siang Jin Chua; Mohan Tiru; Rabind Antony Charles; Vidya Sudarshan
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-13

3.  Defibrillation testing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: when, how, and by whom?

Authors:  Luis A Pires
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.