Literature DB >> 9352958

The challenge of effectively communicating risk-benefit information.

I R Edwards1, B Hugman.   

Abstract

Although the techniques involved in drug safety monitoring (pharmacovigilance) have dramatically improved in recent years, communication of these issues to health professionals and the public lags far behind. Several measures need to be taken in order to address this discrepancy. A climate of greater openness concerning the basis of merit assessments must be created. We need to develop merit-assessment formulations that are more accurate and helpful when treating individual patients in clinical situations. All of the involved groups must be educated about the nature of drugs and drug therapy, and the possibilities and limitations of such therapy. More effective techniques and systems have to be developed in order to stimulate higher rates of high quality spontaneous reporting of adverse effects. More conscientious and purposeful attention to the theory and practice of communications, in order to ensure the effective delivery of optimal benefits to patients, clinicians and society at large, would also be advantageous. We must ensure that where issues of public health and confidence in the medical profession are at stake, we employ the very best communications practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9352958     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199717040-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  11 in total

1.  Attitudes to adverse drug reaction reporting in the Northern Region.

Authors:  D N Bateman; G L Sanders; M D Rawlins
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Reasons for reporting adverse drug reactions--some thoughts based on an international review.

Authors:  C Biriell; I R Edwards
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Medicines and risk.

Authors:  L E Böttiger
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Speaking about pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  D McNamee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-10-05       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Concepts in risk-benefit assessment. A simple merit analysis of a medicine?

Authors:  R Edwards; B E Wiholm; C Martinez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Sources in science: who can we trust?

Authors:  T Wilkie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Television entertainment and the US health-care debate.

Authors:  J Turow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Attitudinal survey of adverse drug reaction reporting by medical practitioners in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  K J Belton; S C Lewis; S Payne; M D Rawlins; S M Wood
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Third generation oral contraceptives--the controversy.

Authors:  D Carnall; H Karcher; L G Lie; T Sheldon; D Spurgeon; D Josefson; C Zinn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-16

10.  Preclinical toxicological testing and safeguards in clinical trials.

Authors:  D G Grahame-Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacovigilance in perspective.

Authors:  R H Meyboom; A C Egberts; F W Gribnau; Y A Hekster
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Communication of medical product risk: how effective is effective enough?

Authors:  Stephen A Goldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Public pharmacovigilance communication: a process calling for evidence-based, objective-driven strategies.

Authors:  Priya Bahri
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  The role of the WHO programme on International Drug Monitoring in coordinating worldwide drug safety efforts.

Authors:  S Olsson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Effective communication of drug safety information to patients and the public: a new look.

Authors:  Eleanor M Vogt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Focusing on risk communication about medicines: why now?

Authors:  Priya Bahri; Mira Harrison-Woolrych
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.