Literature DB >> 21077698

Public pharmacovigilance communication: a process calling for evidence-based, objective-driven strategies.

Priya Bahri1.   

Abstract

As a contribution to the debate on how best to communicate information on the effective and safe use of medicines to patients, healthcare professionals and the general public, this article proposes to distinguish between communication and transparency purposes, and to test a strategic health communication approach. Any organization aiming to improve medicines use could adapt this approach to its remits and legal obligations. The approach includes agreeing measurable communication objectives through shared problem ownership of all concerned parties, evidence-based design and a cyclic process for planning, implementation and evaluation of communication as a public health intervention. The evidence base, which supplements risk assessment for product- and situation-specific communication on safety concerns, would be derived from research into drug utilization, medical decision making and risk perception, as well as from the participation of patients and healthcare professionals. It is crucial to address the practical questions and concerns of medicine users and to find out why unfavourable patterns of medicine use persist, in order to develop behaviour change models for overcoming these obstacles. For this purpose, appropriate models for facilitating the participation of medicine users in the risk management process will need to be explored. Such two-way communication would inform risk assessment as well as the analysis of risk minimization options, allow for agreement upon communication objectives and enable understandable, attractive communication materials to be designed. The communication programme should use mixed media and repetition of messages for long-term success. This would require cooperation within healthcare and medical information systems. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the communication should support the sustainability of the programme and provide lessons for the future. Given its mission, the pharmacovigilance community has the standing and duty to expand its scale of action and take the initiative in advancing risk management through a scientific approach to improving public communication for the safety of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21077698     DOI: 10.2165/11539040-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  35 in total

Review 1.  The public health implications of the 1995 'pill scare'.

Authors:  A Furedi
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Systemic risks: a new challenge for risk management.

Authors:  Ortwin Renn; Andreas Klinke
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  B Shaw; F Cheater; R Baker; C Gillies; H Hearnshaw; S Flottorp; N Robertson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

Review 4.  Drug safety and the media.

Authors:  Patrick C Waller; Stephen J W Evans; Keith Beard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Risk perception of prescription drugs: report on a survey in Canada.

Authors:  P Slovic; N Kraus; H Lappe; M Major
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1991 May-Jun

Review 6.  Discourse on safe drug use: symbolic logics and ethical aspects.

Authors:  Sylvie Fainzang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Improving communication of drug risks to prevent patient injury: proceedings of a workshop.

Authors:  William H Campbell; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Erice Statement 2009: communication, medicines and patient safety.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Severe undertreatment of cancer pain: a 3-year survey of the German situation.

Authors:  M Zenz; T Zenz; M Tryba; M Strumpf
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Psychological determinants of the intention to educate patients about benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Geeske Brecht Ten Wolde; A Dijkstra; P Van Empelen; A Knuistingh Neven; F G Zitman
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-12-18
View more
  19 in total

1.  The Additional Value of an E-Mail to Inform Healthcare Professionals of a Drug Safety Issue: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sigrid Piening; Pieter A de Graeff; Sabine M J M Straus; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Trends in use of antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia: Impact of national safety warnings.

Authors:  Adeline Gallini; Sandrine Andrieu; Julie M Donohue; Naïma Oumouhou; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre; Virginie Gardette
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.600

3.  Drug vs class-specific black box warnings: does one bad drug spoil the bunch?

Authors:  Stacie B Dusetzina; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Pharmacovigilance and the null hypothesis: do we do much for public health?

Authors:  I Ralph Edwards; Ambrose Isah
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Bridging the efficacy-effectiveness gap: a regulator's perspective on addressing variability of drug response.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Eichler; Eric Abadie; Alasdair Breckenridge; Bruno Flamion; Lars L Gustafsson; Hubert Leufkens; Malcolm Rowland; Christian K Schneider; Brigitte Bloechl-Daum
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Relevance of a "Dear Doctor letter" to alert healthcare providers to new recommendations for vitamin D administration.

Authors:  Hélène Théophile; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Philip Robinson; Nicholas Moore; Bernard Bégaud; Françoise Haramburu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  The ISoP CommSIG for Improving Medicinal Product Risk Communication: A New Special Interest Group of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Priya Bahri; Alexander N Dodoo; Brian D Edwards; I Ralph Edwards; Irene Fermont; Ulrich Hagemann; Kenneth Hartigan-Go; Bruce Hugman; Peter G Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Impact of medicines regulatory risk communications in the UK on prescribing and clinical outcomes: Systematic review, time series analysis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Weatherburn; Bruce Guthrie; Tobias Dreischulte; Daniel R Morales
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stacie B Dusetzina; Ashley S Higashi; E Ray Dorsey; Rena Conti; Haiden A Huskamp; Shu Zhu; Craig F Garfield; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Quality of Reporting on the Evaluation of Risk Minimization Programs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea M Russell; Elaine H Morrato; Rebecca M Lovett; Meredith Y Smith
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.