Literature DB >> 9351714

Implantable left ventricular assist devices: an evolving long-term cardiac replacement therapy.

J J DeRose1, M Argenziano, B C Sun, K Reemtsma, M C Oz, E A Rose.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors' 8-year experience with both inpatient and outpatient left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is presented to show the possibilities and limitations of long-term outpatient mechanical circulatory assistance. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The limitation of suitable cardiac donors has led to the use of LVADs as a temporizing measure for patients awaiting cardiac transplantation. The success of such devices in the short and medium term as a bridge to transplantation has led to their evaluation as a long-term destination therapy for end-stage heart disease.
METHODS: Between August 1990 and February 1997, 85 patients with end-stage heart disease underwent insertion of implantable LVADs. Fifty-two patients underwent pneumatic device insertion and 32 patients received a vented electric device.
RESULTS: Patients were supported for a mean of 109+/-13 days for an overall survival to transplant (54) or explant (3) of 73%. Nineteen patients were discharged from the hospital on a mean of postoperative day 41+/-4 (range, 17-68) for an outpatient support time of 108+/-30 days (range, 2-466). Of 12 patients supported after postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, 10 (82%) survived to hospital discharge. Perioperative right ventricular failure was treated in most patients with inotropic agents and inhaled nitric oxide with only six patients requiring right ventricular assist device support. Thromboembolic rate was low (0.016 events/patient-month) despite minimal or no anticoagulation in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular assist device support has evolved to become an outpatient therapy with excellent survival rates and an acceptable morbidity. Accordingly, wearable LVADs should be studied as permanent treatment options for patients who are not transplant candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9351714      PMCID: PMC1191061          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199710000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Improved mortality and rehabilitation of transplant candidates treated with a long-term implantable left ventricular assist system.

Authors:  O H Frazier; E A Rose; P McCarthy; N A Burton; A Tector; H Levin; H L Kayne; V L Poirier; K A Dasse
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Bridge experience with long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices. Are they an alternative to transplantation?

Authors:  M C Oz; M Argenziano; K A Catanese; M T Gardocki; D J Goldstein; R C Ashton; A C Gelijns; E A Rose; H R Levin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Bertram Pitt; Clarence E Davis; William B Hood; Jay N Cohn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Extended support with permanent systems: percutaneous versus totally implantable.

Authors:  D G Pennington
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Economic impact of heart failure in the United States: time for a different approach.

Authors:  J B O'Connell; M R Bristow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Prevalence and mortality rate of congestive heart failure in the United States.

Authors:  D D Schocken; M I Arrieta; P E Leaverton; E A Ross
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  HeartMate implantable left ventricular assist device: bridge to transplantation and future applications.

Authors:  P M McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Wearable long-term mechanical support for patients with end-stage heart disease: a tenable goal.

Authors:  E A Rose; D J Goldstein
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Use of aprotinin in LVAD recipients reduces blood loss, blood use, and perioperative mortality.

Authors:  D J Goldstein; J A Seldomridge; J M Chen; K A Catanese; C M DeRosa; A D Weinberg; C R Smith; E A Rose; H R Levin; M C Oz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Artificial circulatory support with textured interior surfaces. A counterintuitive approach to minimizing thromboembolism.

Authors:  E A Rose; H R Levin; M C Oz; O H Frazier; Q Macmanus; N A Burton; E A Lefrak
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

1.  Myocardial Fas and cytokine expression in end-stage heart failure: impact of LVAD support.

Authors:  Maninder S Bedi; Rene J Alvarez; Toru Kubota; Richard Sheppard; Robert L Kormos; Michael P Siegenthaler; Arthur M Feldman; Charles F McTiernan; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Heart Failure Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Suriya Punchai; Zubaidah Nor Hanipah; Gautam Sharma; Ali Aminian; Karen Steckner; Jacek Cywinski; James B Young; Stacy A Brethauer; Philip R Schauer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Stem Cell Therapy for the Heart: Blind Alley or Magic Bullet?

Authors:  Arne A N Bruyneel; Apurv Sehgal; Sophia Malandraki-Miller; Carolyn Carr
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.132

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.