Literature DB >> 9350722

Evaluation of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and two latex agglutination assays for diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection.

A Svahn1, M Magnusson, L Jägdahl, L Schloss, G Kahlmeter, A Linde.   

Abstract

Three commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) from Gull, Biotest, and Behring (Enzygnost) and two latex agglutination tests for heterophile antibodies (Monolatex [Biotest] and Mono-Lex [Trinity Laboratories]) were evaluated for the diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and EBV seropositivity. Two hundred fourteen consecutive samples from 197 patients with symptoms of primary EBV infection were analyzed by the five assays at a clinical microbiology laboratory. The samples were also analyzed independently by immunofluorescence methods at a reference laboratory. According to the reference methods, 37 patients (40 serum samples) had primary EBV infections, 120 patients (127 serum samples) had had past EBV infections, 33 patients (36 serum samples) were seronegative, and 7 patients (11 serum samples) exhibited atypical reactions. The respective sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of primary EBV infection were 95 and 100% for the Gull assays, 100 and 94% for the Biotest assays, and 100 and 89%, for the Enzygnost assays. The Monolatex and Mono-Lex methods showed similar sensitivities and specificities (78 to 85% and 100 to 99%, respectively) for the diagnosis of primary EBV infection. This study demonstrates the usefulness of commercially available assays for the rapid diagnosis of primary EBV infection, but also the importance of large-scale testing of routine samples before choosing an assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9350722      PMCID: PMC230050          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2728-2732.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Incidence of heterophil antibody responses in children with infectious mononucleosis.

Authors:  G Fleisher; E T Lennette; G Henle; W Henle
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Compact Epstein-Barr virus diagnosis based on a defined antigen mix and specific IgA.

Authors:  H D Dopatka; W Schuy
Journal:  Res Virol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

3.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.

Authors:  M C Reid; M S Lachs; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Evaluation of five enzyme immunoassays for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigens.

Authors:  D L Wiedbrauk; S Bassin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Serological diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis using three anti-Epstein-Barr virus recombinant ELISAs.

Authors:  I Färber; P Wutzler; P Wohlrabe; H Wolf; W Hinderer; H H Sonneborn
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.014

6.  Subclass reactivity to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen in primary and reactivated EBV infections.

Authors:  A Linde; J Andersson; G Lundgren; B Wahren
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.327

7.  Antibody responses to Epstein-Barr virus-determined nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 and EBNA-2 in acute and chronic Epstein-Barr virus infection.

Authors:  W Henle; G Henle; J Andersson; I Ernberg; G Klein; C A Horwitz; G Marklund; L Rymo; C Wellinder; S E Straus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with two synthetic peptides of Epstein-Barr virus for diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.

Authors:  A Linde; B Kallin; J Dillner; J Andersson; L Jägdahl; A Lindvall; B Wahren
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Comparative evaluation of nine kits for rapid diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis and Epstein-Barr virus-specific serology.

Authors:  M Linderholm; J Boman; P Juto; A Linde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  NIH conference. Epstein-Barr virus infections: biology, pathogenesis, and management.

Authors:  S E Straus; J I Cohen; G Tosato; J Meier
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus-related diseases.

Authors:  M L Gulley
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Routine Epstein-Barr virus diagnostics from the laboratory perspective: still challenging after 35 years.

Authors:  Ralf D Hess
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  Massimo De Paschale; Pierangelo Clerici
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2012-02-12

4.  Epstein-Barr virus serologic abnormalities and risk of rheumatoid arthritis among women.

Authors:  Barbara L Goldstein; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.815

5.  Application of virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgA antibody detection with a polyantigenic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections in childhood.

Authors:  L Schaade; M Kleines; M Häusler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of 12 commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific and heterophile antibodies.

Authors:  A L Bruu; R Hjetland; E Holter; L Mortensen; O Natås; W Petterson; A G Skar; T Skarpaas; T Tjade; B Asjø
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2000-05

7.  Novel immunoblot assay using four recombinant antigens for diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus primary infection and reactivation.

Authors:  M Buisson; B Fleurent; M Mak; P Morand; L Chan; A Ng; M Guan; D Chin; J M Seigneurin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of a multiplexed bead assay for assessment of Epstein-Barr virus immunologic status.

Authors:  J S Klutts; R S Liao; W M Dunne; A M Gronowski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Search for Anti-EA(D) Antibodies in Subjects with an "Isolated VCA IgG" Pattern.

Authors:  Massimo De Paschale; Debora Cagnin; Teresa Cerulli; Maria Teresa Manco; Carlo Agrappi; Paola Mirri; Arianna Gatti; Cristina Rescaldani; Pierangelo Clerici
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-20

10.  Evaluation of four commercially available Epstein-Barr virus enzyme immunoassays with an immunofluorescence assay as the reference method.

Authors:  Barbara C Gärtner; Ralf D Hess; Dirk Bandt; Alexander Kruse; Axel Rethwilm; Klaus Roemer; Nikolaus Mueller-Lantzsch
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.