Literature DB >> 10799460

Evaluation of 12 commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific and heterophile antibodies.

A L Bruu1, R Hjetland, E Holter, L Mortensen, O Natås, W Petterson, A G Skar, T Skarpaas, T Tjade, B Asjø.   

Abstract

Ten microbiological departments in Norway have participated in a multicenter evaluation of the following commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific and heterophile antibodies: CAPTIA Select viral capsid antigen (VCA)-M/G/EBNA (Centocor Inc.), Enzygnost anti-EBV/immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG (Dade Behring), Vironostika EBV VCA IgM/IgG/EBNA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Organon Teknika), SEROFLUOR immunofluorescence assay and EBV Combi-Test (Institute Virion Ltd.), anti-EBV recombinant IgM- and IgG-early antigen/EBNA IgG ELISA (Biotest Diagnostics), EBV IgM/IgG/EBNA ELISA (Gull Laboratories), Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn test (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur), Monosticon Dri-Dot (Organon Teknika), Avitex-IM (Omega Diagnostics Ltd.), Alexon Serascan infectious mononucleosis test (Alexon Biomedical Inc. ), Clearview IM (Unipath Ltd.), and Cards+/-OS Mono (Pacific Biotech, Inc.). The test panel included sera from patients with primary EBV infection, immunocompromised patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection, healthy persons (blood donors), and EBV-seronegative persons. Among the tests for EBV-specific antibodies the sensitivity was good, with only small differences between the different assays. However, there was a greater variation in specificity, which varied between 100% (Enzygnost) and 86% (Biotest). Tests for detection of heterophile antibodies based on purified or selected antigen (Avitex, Alexon, Clearview IM, and Cards+/-OS Mono) were more sensitive than the Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn and Monosticon tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10799460      PMCID: PMC95893          DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.7.3.451-456.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol        ISSN: 1071-412X


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of six commercially available kits using purified heterophile antigen for the rapid diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis compared with Epstein-Barr virus-specific serology.

Authors:  F Elgh; M Linderholm
Journal:  Clin Diagn Virol       Date:  1996-10

Review 2.  Epstein-Barr virus serologic testing: diagnostic indications and interpretations.

Authors:  C V Sumaya
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1986 May-Jun

3.  Serological and clinical findings in patients with serological evidence of reactivated Epstein-Barr virus infection.

Authors:  N Obel; M Høier-Madsen; H Kangro
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  Evaluation of ten commercial heterophile antibody tests for infectious mononucleosis.

Authors:  E A Høiby; T Tjade; O J Røtterud
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand C       Date:  1985-08

5.  Evaluation of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and two latex agglutination assays for diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection.

Authors:  A Svahn; M Magnusson; L Jägdahl; L Schloss; G Kahlmeter; A Linde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Immunoreactivation of Epstein-Barr virus due to cytomegalovirus primary infection.

Authors:  S M Aalto; K Linnavuori; H Peltola; E Vuori; B Weissbrich; J Schubert; L Hedman; K Hedman
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.327

7.  Coincidence of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, cytomegalovirus infection, and rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  M W Hornef; G Bein; L Fricke; J Steinhoff; H J Wagner; W Hinderer; H H Sonneborn; H Kirchner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

  7 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 7.

Authors:  W S A Smellie; J Forth; S R S Smart; M J Galloway; W Irving; D Bareford; P O Collinson; K G Kerr; G Summerfield; P J Carey; Rubin Minhas
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Performance of two commercially available automated immunoassays for the determination of Epstein-Barr virus serological status.

Authors:  J Lupo; R Germi; T Semenova; M Buisson; J M Seigneurin; P Morand
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-04-25

Review 3.  Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  Massimo De Paschale; Pierangelo Clerici
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2012-02-12

4.  Epstein-Barr virus serologic abnormalities and risk of rheumatoid arthritis among women.

Authors:  Barbara L Goldstein; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.815

Review 5.  Serodiagnosis for tumor viruses.

Authors:  Brian J Morrison; Nazzarena Labo; Wendell J Miley; Denise Whitby
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  18-year-old woman with fever, abdominal pain, and elevated liver enzymes.

Authors:  Michael E Wilson; Brent T Cengia; Seth Sweetser
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Application of virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgA antibody detection with a polyantigenic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections in childhood.

Authors:  L Schaade; M Kleines; M Häusler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Virologic Diagnosis, Viral Monitoring, and Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus Infectious Mononucleosis.

Authors:  Hal B. Jenson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Predictive markers for development of strongyloidiasis in patients infected with both Strongyloides stercoralis and HTLV-1.

Authors:  M Satoh; S Kiyuna; Y Shiroma; H Toma; A Kokaze; Y Sato
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Epstein-Barr virus antibody level and gastric cancer risk in Korea: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Y Kim; A Shin; J Gwack; K-P Ko; C-S Kim; S K Park; Y-C Hong; D Kang; K-Y Yoo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.