Literature DB >> 9349244

What do managed care plans do to affect care? Results from a survey of physicians.

D K Remler1, K Donelan, R J Blendon, G D Lundberg, L L Leape, D R Calkins, K Binns, J P Newhouse.   

Abstract

Little is known about physicians' exposure to managed care techniques that affect clinical practice. In 1995, we conducted a survey of 2,003 U.S. physicians asking them about their share of patients subject to a variety of managed care techniques. Nationally, 24% of physicians received some form of capitation payment for their patients. The two most widely used techniques were utilization review (UR), applied to an average of 59% of patients, and discounted fees, applied to an average of 38% of patients. Although UR was common, ultimate denial rates of coverage were very low: at most 3% for the types of care studied. Use of managed care techniques varied more within states than between states. Conventional measures of HMO market penetration revealed little about how managed care affects physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9349244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inquiry        ISSN: 0046-9580            Impact factor:   1.730


  10 in total

1.  HMO growth and the geographical redistribution of generalist and specialist physicians, 1987-1997.

Authors:  J J Escarce; D Polsky; G D Wozniak; P R Kletke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The trouble with ethics: results of a national survey of healthcare executives.

Authors:  C L Jurkiewicz
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2000-06

3.  Clinicians as advocates: an exploratory study of responses to managed care by mental health professionals.

Authors:  Nancy Wolff; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  A loss of faith: the sources of reduced political legitimacy for the American medical profession.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  A test of mental health parity: comparisons of outcomes of hospital concurrent utilization review.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Murray; Jeffrey B Henriques
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 6.  Healthcare organizational change: implications for access to care and its measurement.

Authors:  R H Miller
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Medical care expenditures under gatekeeper and point-of-service arrangements.

Authors:  J J Escarce; K Kapur; G F Joyce; K A Van Vorst
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Impact of managed care on the treatment, costs, and outcomes of fee-for-service Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M Kate Bundorf; Kevin A Schulman; Judith A Stafford; Darrell Gaskin; James G Jollis; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Physician financial incentives and care for the underserved in the United States.

Authors:  Alyna T Chien; Marshall H Chin; G Caleb Alexander; Hui Tang; Monica E Peek
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Medicaid TEFRA option in Minnesota: implications for patient rights.

Authors:  B Chan; N Vanderburg
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1999
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.